massachusetts institute of technology tour

Suggestions or Feedback?

Whether you’re a prospective student or a tourist visiting the Boston area, we invite you to explore our dynamic campus and experience firsthand how MIT is making a better world .

MIT is located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, across the Charles River from Boston. The main entrance is 77 Massachusetts Avenue.

For maps and questions, stop by the Information Center in Room 7-121, inside the main entrance on the right. Office hours are 9–5, Monday–Friday, excluding legal and Institute holidays .

Parking in Cambridge and Boston can be expensive and hard to find. Whenever possible, park your car at your hotel and use public transportation [link to public transportation above] or a taxi/rideshare service. If you must drive to the campus, on- and off-street parking is available for a fee, but most public parking is not very close to the center of campus. More parking information is available from Parkopedia .

Visiting prospective students may park in designated areas on a first-come, first-served basis.

Other resources

Accessibility map
Self-guided walking tour map

The Kendall/MIT subway station is the closest stop to campus.

There is plenty to see and do, both on campus and in the greater Boston area.

On the MIT campus

Stop by Killian Court and the Great Dome , one of the most iconic spots on campus.

Take in the galleries and exhibits at the MIT Museum , where art, science, and technology intersect.

Explore public art on campus , including works by Picasso, Calder, and other major artists.

Visit the List Visual Arts Center , MIT’s contemporary arts museum.

Admire students’ creative work at the Wiesner Student Art Gallery .

Browse MIT’s special collections, including historical documents, rare books, and maps, at the Maihaugen Gallery of the MIT Libraries .

Learn about nautical engineering at the Hart Nautical Gallery , which houses one of the most important collections of nautical materials in the country.

Witness the work being done at the cutting edge of cancer research at the Koch Institute Public Galleries .

Delight in a display of hacks on the Charles M. Vest Student Street in the Stata Center .

Shop at the MIT Coop for MIT-branded apparel and other souvenirs.

Around Cambridge and Boston

Trace the footsteps of Boston’s founders on the Freedom Trail .

Quack your way through a duck tour .

Visit Fenway Park , home of the Boston Red Sox.

Learn about the life and presidency of John F. Kennedy at his namesake library.

Appreciate the classics at the Museum of Fine Arts , or get some hands-on learning at the Museum of Science .

Climb to the top of the Bunker Hill Monument for a panoramic view of Boston.

Where to eat
Where to stay

Welcome!

To register for a visit, please select a visit day from the calendar and fill out the form with your info. And that’s it! We’ll be in touch soon with additional info to help you plan your day and remind you when it’s time for your visit. We can’t wait to meet you! Session schedule: Sessions take place Monday through Friday. If the calendar does not yet have the date you plan to visit, please check back a month from your desired date.

No walk-in availability: All visitors must be pre-registered to attend Admissions programming. Walk in visitors will be provided with a self-guided walking tour map.

MIT Institute Events

MIT Visitors

Currently, visitors are welcome in outdoor spaces on campus and may enter non-residential campus buildings while escorted. See the visitors policy for full details and the visitor information pages for more on the MIT Welcome Center , directions and parking , where to dine or stay , and what to do while on campus .

Related resources:

Campus tours & info sessions
MIT Events Calendar

MIT Admissions

If you are interested in learning more about MIT and our campus, there are online information sessions and other resources on the Admissions website to help answer your questions and allow you to explore MIT .

Interactive MIT campus map

To Admissions
To Events Calendar
Past events

Undergraduate
Postdoctoral Programs
Future Engineers
Professional Education
Open Access
Global Experiences
Student Activities
Leadership Development
Graduate Student Fellowships
Aeronautics and Astronautics
Biological Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
Materials Science and Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Industry Collaborations
Engineering in Action
In The News
Video Features
Newsletter: The Infinite
Ask an Engineer
Facts and Figures
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Staff Spotlights
Commencement 2024

We are part of one of the coolest, most creative, and intellectually vibrant ecosystems on Earth.

Originally founded in Boston, MIT now makes its home in the city of Cambridge, a place the New York Times says, “blends its erudite character with a rich serving of arts and culture.”

Our campus is situated in Kendall Square , a hub brimming with technology giants, biotechnology firms, and startups. Ever evolving, the plans to develop our neighborhood are next-level cool.

But we aren’t all engineering and no play. Our campus is a mere 364.4 smoots (plus or minus one ear) across the Charles River to Boston, where foodies can indulge, sports fanatics can cheer, and history buffs can walk the streets of Paul Revere. We are also only a subway ride away from the beach and a short road trip to the Green Mountains or the White Mountains.

The bottom line: this city has something for everyone. We encourage you to come check it out for yourself.

Official Tours

Prospective students.

The Office of Admissions conducts information sessions followed by student-led campus tours for students, families, and groups. For more information on how to schedule, please contact the MIT Office of Admissions .

MIT Campus Map and Directions

Interactive MIT map
Getting to MIT

Unofficial Tours

Self-guided walking tour
Architectural tours
Trademark tours

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Women's Swimming and Diving 7/16/2024 10:53:00 AM

13 From Women's Swim and Dive Named CSCAA Scholar All-American; Engineers Earn Scholar All-America Team Honors

Players mentioned.

Kate Augustyn

Hannah Donner

Lauren Levy

Annika Naveen

Natalie Tang

Fiora Beratahani

Thanks for visiting !

The use of software that blocks ads hinders our ability to serve you the content you came here to enjoy.

We ask that you consider turning off your ad blocker so we can deliver you the best experience possible while you are here.

Thank you for your support!

was not found

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

General Information

2023-2024 tuition, student housing, enrollment statistics, undergraduate student gender, undergraduate race / ethnicity, undergraduate admissions, admission considerations, admission test scores, sports and athletics, men's sports.

Men's Baseball
Men's Basketball
Men's Cross Country
Men's Diving
Men's Fencing
Men's Football
Men's Lacrosse
Men's Soccer
Men's Swimming
Men's Tennis
Men's Track & Field
Men's Volleyball
Men's Water Polo

Women's Sports

Women's Basketball
Women's Cross Country
Women's Diving
Women's Fencing
Women's Field Hockey
Women's Lacrosse
Women's Crew
Women's Soccer
Women's Softball
Women's Swimming
Women's Tennis
Women's Track & Field
Women's Volleyball

Majors/Degrees Conferred

-d denotes that program is also offered through distance education.

College Search

More than 30 million students have used campustours to find virtual campus tours and maps..

MIT Office of the President

Listening tour, suggestions from across mit.

MIT President Sally Kornbluth chatting with a student

President Kornbluth is continuing her Listening Tour this semester. Fresh updates will be posted in the coming weeks.

Dear colleagues and students,

Since I began my listening tour in January 2023, you’ve told me what’s working well and where we can do better, suggested priorities that need my attention, and offered thoughtful advice for how to bring our community together. I’m grateful for all of it. My inaugural address in May 2023 reflected what I heard up to that point on the tour, which will continue this fall.

Although I’m sure that I have not captured every one of the many comments I’ve heard so far, I’ve tried to group the community’s feedback thematically below. The points you see here aren’t direct quotes from individuals, but we do have extensive notes that underpin this summary. You’ll see contradictory opinions and advice. I have not attempted to resolve these conflicts, because my goal with this page is simply to give you a sense of what I’m hearing. If you have attended a listening tour session and you feel that I’ve not mentioned something significant from the session, please feel free to email me and let me know .

We’ll continue to update this page as the tour progresses, and I’ll be sure to keep you posted on the actions we’re taking.

Best, Sally Kornbluth

Academic priorities

Collaboration and communication, culture and community, grad student unionization, housing and dining, mental health, what does success look like for mit’s administration in this moment.

Students are saying…

At the very top of my list is solving the climate crisis.

Staff are saying…

The thing that makes me proudest of working at MIT is that this place can walk us back from the precipice of disaster on climate change.

Faculty are saying…

There’s tremendous hunger to do something bold around climate and sustainability that leverages MIT’s unique strengths.
Letting everyone do their excellent work in separate siloes isn't effective for climate change; we need some sort of organizing principle.
Consider a college of climate. If we don’t use a word like “college,” the initiative will be seen as less of a priority than computing. We need something that is, and that sounds, institutional.
We should be leaders in thinking about the impact of computing on the climate. Computing has a large impact on our carbon footprint, and we should take the lead in addressing these effects.
Think about AI as a multidisciplinary issue—how people and computers work together. Maybe MIT could catalyze a global network of people and computers thinking about solutions to climate change. Think of it as a “supermind” approach to the problem.
You can’t solve the climate crisis without dealing with inequality.
MIT has the visibility and resources to do more to address sustainability on campus. We could be more active in aligning our research/academic pursuits with our sustainability efforts here at home.
I’d like to see an overarching vision for the life sciences at MIT codified and advanced in some way.
The coming decade offers an exciting opportunity to change the world and MIT by establishing something like an institute for advanced biotechnologies in the heart of campus.
I’d like to see a focus on synthetic biology as an avenue for more fully understanding basic biological processes.
Leadership in studying the societal implications of AI needs to be more distributed. SERC has great potential, but we need to work on this issue more broadly.
Generative AI tools are advancing at a breathtaking pace. Universities don’t move as fast as industry. We need to do more at MIT to understand and communicate the consequences of the stunning growth of this technology. Bring together researchers from across disciplines to study the issue and contribute to the public dialogue.
The college is partnering with SHASS in a good way to explore the social consequences of AI and other technologies.
We need to be nimbler. If the models of knowledge here at MIT don’t meet the challenges of today, change them. Rethink the visiting committee structure to be problem focused rather than department specific.
We need more collective efforts on serious cross-cutting issues like MIT’s Future of Work study.
When you think about big initiatives you might launch, keep those on the margins front of mind.
We’re missing dual-interest students who see STEM and SHASS equally. I wish we did a better job encouraging incoming students to pursue a range of interests at MIT.
All of the top-down initiatives prevent us from doing things that we care about.
Don’t try to justify basic science in terms of the problems it might solve down the line. It has value in its own right.
A quantum revolution is happening. MIT has great strengths in the field, but there’s no connectivity or coordination.
MIT should do more to build academic depth in electrical chemistry and electrical chemical engineering. We’re not addressing this growing issue coherently.
We can increase the impact of our work in the life sciences and health by fostering stronger, more systematic relationships with hospitals.
We have an exciting opportunity to do more to integrate AI and the life sciences.

Staff are saying...

The rise of anti-intellectualism across the country concerns me. MIT has a role to play in helping our society navigate this new normal.
Advanced manufacturing is vital to the country’s security. We have an exciting opportunity to do more in this space.
Speak with moral authority and articulate substantive ideas about universities as a force for good in society.
We have a huge opportunity to help implement recent federal legislation like the infrastructure bill and the CHIPS and Science Act. I hope MIT will seize the opportunity and lead, especially with the issue of sustainability front of mind.
The federal government listens to MIT. If we see things that are making it difficult to do our jobs regarding open scholarship, IT security, grant funding, or anything else, we should make the case to policymakers.
I’d be proud of MIT if we find ways to advance and support democracy.
MIT has an outsized voice in advocating for federal research funding, and we need to speak out on the difficulties in increasing graduate student and postdoctoral salaries without increasing the size of grants.
MIT should do more to speak out on the dangers of scientific misinformation.
Be willing to say “no” if you’re not going to do something we’ve asked for. Even if you think we won’t like the answer, be straight with us.
Students want a seat at the table. There are times when student engagement has been done well and times when it hasn’t.
Students want consultation to be real—don’t pretend to consult with us and then disregard our input.
Decentralization is great—it allows departments to put their own spin on things—but we need better communication and a baseline of consistency.
There’s an incredible loss of institutional knowledge when someone leaves one of our offices.
Put a link or a simple, anonymous survey on the MIT homepage asking community members to share the problems they see and offer potential solutions. There will be patterns.
Management isn’t receptive to input from the people who are doing the work.
There’s a gaping need for enhanced student information systems.
MIT could do more to improve the flow of communication and create new opportunities for collaboration between campus and Lincoln Lab.
There’s been a breakdown in trust between the administration and faculty. The most important thing you can do is restore that trust.
95% of the time, our faculty governance structure serves us well.
The staff to the faculty and Institute-level committees are invaluable.
A faculty senate or other structural change would signal a desire for serious engagement with the faculty.
I’ve noticed a shift in faculty governance. Twenty years ago, there wasn’t a lot of space between the faculty and administration, and it felt like the faculty were running the Institute. That’s changed. We now have a dysfunctional system of faculty governance.
We expect senior officers to make top-down decisions, but meaningful engagement with those of us in the trenches is important. Consult with us and listen to us before making a decision. We won’t agree with every decision you make, but we’ll understand if you talk with us in advance, particularly if you explain your decisions transparently.
It feels like there’s an implicit communication from the Institute that you can only be successful if you’re in Course 6. That’s where the resources go.
Do random outreach to faculty. Invite faculty, staff, and students to come talk to you in small groups. Even if you can’t meet with everyone, word will get out that you’re making an effort to engage broadly.
Create open forums like the 8:00 am calls during the pandemic to bring people together to discuss hard issues and share information.
Do more to convene important conversations of faculty across disciplines on hard problems.
When the administration launches a new initiative, we groan. There’s a big launch with lots of energy, and then the work, including fundraising, is transferred to the shoulders of the faculty.
SHASS faculty can be made to feel subordinate to our STEM colleagues. We’re invited to play a role, but it’s often as an add-on and without resources.
We spend so much time doing email that in-person interaction has suffered. The fun of learning and engaging is lost when we’re not physically together. Too much communication is electronic.
Leading faculty researchers don’t have time to serve on committees and attend lots of meetings. As a result, the people who are most active in decision making aren’t representative of the faculty who have to live with those decisions.
The burden of procuring clinical data has shifted to individual PIs. Our researchers could be so much more effective with more comprehensive data sharing agreements.
The faculty are too siloed. I wish we were more integrated and more connected to our colleagues around the Institute.
Staff are overworked and underpaid, and we simply can’t do our jobs without them.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion are among the most important issues for students.
Graduate students don’t care about the free speech debate. They’re focused on issues like childcare, housing, and the cost of living.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action will challenge you immediately. It’s important to us that we maintain a commitment to diversity.
Student culture needs to be allowed to flourish or MIT will lose its strength as a draw for talent.
We want the administration to send messages when hateful things are said and done anywhere on campus, including in the dorms. We see silence as tolerating hate on campus.
We want you to listen to and respond to the interests and needs of students of color and work with students to create tailored orientation and training programs directed at reducing racism at MIT.
We want you to address longstanding concerns of the Indigenous community, including increased Indigenous presence in student affairs and on the faculty. We also want you to examine historical issues, such as the naming of Walker Memorial and issues surrounding the land acknowledgement.
We want you to quickly condemn acts of hatred aimed at the LGBTQ community and work to increase the visibility of and celebration of this community.
There are so many cool events at MIT, but I don’t usually hear about them until after they’ve happened.
I don’t always feel that offices like IDHR give me the justice I want. There’s a lot of bad behavior that might not rise to a policy violation. I wish there was more MIT could do to address it.
Free speech is the most important issue for me as a graduate student.
MIT has become a bit sterile and corporate.
We say sometimes that there’s a hierarchy at MIT: faculty, then students, then furniture, then staff.
I haven’t felt the hierarchy that some staff describe. What keeps me going is knowing that I contribute to making things better at MIT, and people appreciate that.
We sometimes feel afraid to speak up for ourselves if a faculty member says or does something inappropriate.
So many of us have personal side gigs or hobbies. You could do more to recognize and celebrate staff character.
There’s an issue of implicit disrespect at MIT, for example, faculty not meeting with staff for performance reviews, or staff often left to clean up a faculty member’s mess.
You’ve parachuted into a very harsh environment in which everyone is distracted. You’re going to have to work hard to get people’s attention.
Push efforts to hire more Black and brown people.
There isn’t much of a sense of community among academic staff. We’d love it if there was some infrastructure to help us connect with one another across departments.
Before the pandemic, we had regular in-person gatherings to build community and recognize one another. I wish management would do more to help rebuild community.
Bad behavior gets rewarded here.
There’s a challenge with the transfer of knowledge among student leaders post-Covid. In DSL, we’re trying to help address that now.
Students have historically enjoyed a model of self-governance, but there are so many cultural fights occurring that may require our help to address them.
When a student violates a policy or value, we hold them accountable, but it’s important we do so in a caring and compassionate way.
It’s so important that you bring coalitions of people together and get them rowing in the same direction.
There’s no shortage of problems here but also no shortage of people who want to help find solutions. I love that about MIT.
Share a concrete timeline of progress toward the recommendations from the Working Group on Reimagining Public Safety at MIT.
I’m concerned about increased tension between students and the administration.
If the Supreme Court effectively bans race-conscious admissions, many on our campus will feel unwelcome. And marginalized students applying to college will prioritize schools where they know they’ll be supported. The strength of programs that support marginalized populations will be a differentiator in competing for those students.
Create a growth culture and a learning culture rather than cancel culture on campus.
Schools feel more isolated from each other than they used to. We need a more unified institution.
Be more willing to create faculty slots to enable us to hire candidates from underrepresented backgrounds.
We don’t have a place where the faculty can gather across disciplines. A lunchroom would go a long way toward fostering a sense of community among the faculty.
MIT’s work to develop a statement of free expression is very important.
Our communities of staff, faculty, students, and postdocs are divided. We’re not one community at the moment. The job of leadership will be to help us come back together.
The whole population of staff makes MIT what it is. Many staff feel their wellbeing is diminished or an afterthought. We have a dearth of kindness across MIT.
We need to be more generous toward staff, who are at the front lines of the affordability crisis.
The tone of discourse on campus has changed significantly because of Covid and the Epstein crisis. We’re facing more demands and less of a sense of collaboration. I hope we can revive a more respectful tone in our engagement with one another.
MIT has done a good job supporting faculty of Chinese origin. It’s important to me that that continue, especially as relations between the United States and China further deteriorate.
Students who come from places like China, Ukraine, and Russia need a different kind of career advising given political uncertainty in their home countries.
It’s getting harder and harder to attract the best faculty talent. One reason is the pull of commercial research labs. People are choosing industry, where the starting salaries are so much more than what we can offer.
We talk about deferred maintenance in terms of buildings, but there’s deferred maintenance in the relationship between faculty and students. When a difficult event occurs, that disconnect becomes clear.
MIT does not adequately harness the scholarly expertise of its faculty to address problems at MIT (sustainability, computing infrastructure, race relations, etc.).
Covid was a major setback for grad student research. We’re still feeling the effects and will for some time. Students are distracted, hurt, and damaged; it’s affecting all of our research groups. Let’s find ways to lift the students up and get them back on track.
The country’s polarization has flooded our campus. This has me deeply concerned.
I worry that we’re only tinkering around the edges on issues of diversity. I wish there were more help from above and more coordination between the faculty and staff.
Curiosity is one of our community’s most important qualities. It’s important that we foster it.
Find ways to get meaningful input from faculty who don’t have the loudest voices. The more interaction in setting priorities, the better.
MIT has become overly conservative in interpreting government regulations, especially when it comes to engaging internationally.
There’s an entrenched bureaucracy at MIT that isn’t aligned with faculty/student interests. It’s making it harder to do routine things.
My big concern about the future of MIT is that no one’s in the office anymore. It’s so expensive to live in the area, and transportation is so challenging. It’s just easier to work remotely. And that’s a problem.
Maybe have central staff resources when there’s a staffing gap. We’re sometimes looking for staff who know MIT systems and can fill in short term. Maybe there could be a program that sends floating staff around campus to address a need.
There isn’t a good mechanism to train staff coming in from outside. We need help getting staff up and running faster.
There isn’t a career path at MIT for non-faculty researchers. We lose so many good people because of it.

Researchers and postdocs are saying…

I’m very proud of the work we do in my lab, and I’m proud to be a member of the MIT community.
Life as a postdoc can be a very lonely experience. Some labs are small and isolated; others are large and welcoming. It’s all based on the tone the PI sets.
To some extent, we’re left alone to sink or swim as we can. This can be liberating, but it can also be catastrophic.
Consider creating a research design requirement. Some students have no idea what research design is.
There’s a growing hunger for hands-on making activities. This has always been important to the MIT experience, and it’s only becoming more so.
MIT loses a lot of talented, dedicated educators because the commitment to lecturers at an Institute level isn’t the same as it is to researchers.
There’s so much more we could be doing to leverage online education tools. We’ve learned a lot during Covid and need to think boldly about how to foster the best in-person and online learning experience for our students.
We have a great opportunity to strengthen undergraduate advising. Bringing in professional advisors and leveraging technology to improve coordination could be a huge win.
There’s universal agreement that our current General Institute Requirements (GIRs) structure won’t serve us well for the next 20 years, but there’s no agreement on how the GIRs should be revised.
MIT needs to reexamine its undergraduate education to incorporate requirements in computing.
Let’s infuse more climate content into classes, including the GIRs.
I feel like innovations in teaching move in slow motion. MIT could create more opportunities for dynamic, innovative work in the classroom.
Traditional classroom teaching might become less relevant. We need to reimagine the future of campus-based education.
The undergraduate body is the one area at MIT where there’s been limited growth. We have an obligation to the world to produce more alumni at the undergraduate level and we need to think how to expand options here in Cambridge, not just remotely.
Rethink undergraduate education broadly. Why four years? Why two semesters per year?
We have an opportunity to take a big step forward on open scholarship.
ChatGPT presents serious concerns about plagiarism and cheating. MIT should pursue a coordinated, thoughtful strategy that will serve all of us well and that could become a model for academia.
The college is advancing our ability to infuse disciplines with computing and we particularly like the Common Ground, but the college does not have (or is not devoting) sufficient resources to collaborate with us on all of the classes we would like to see.
The concentration of majors in computer science continues to be a problem. We need to convince students that “bilingualism” will help them get jobs and it’s not all about CS.
The new faculty who have been hired in SCC are great, but the joint hires are proceeding more slowly. Also, having one faculty member embedded is not enough to infuse teaching of a discipline with computational thinking.
I’m concerned that students continue to flock to CS at such an overwhelmingly high rate.
UROP is a great strength of MIT. Many students work in the same lab for two to three years. Find a way to acknowledge and reward those students with a credential of some sort.
My UROP experience has been different. My students are never in the lab. They’re doing so many other things and don’t put in the time they should. Students should not do more than one UROP at a time. It would be more valuable to pursue a deeper research experience instead of multiple experiences.
Students are coming to class less and less, and when they do come, many play on their computers and don’t pay attention.
We need to do more to make the in-person class time meaningful. Digital learning is still underutilized.
Alumni sometimes tell me that they regret not taking more SHASS classes when they were students. Maybe MIT could offer a microcredential in certain subjects for alumni.
Advising for students is too fractured. We often don’t know what students are told by their advisors in S3 or elsewhere, so we’re often sending inconsistent messages. We need a more coordinated system.
The very late drop date encourages students to load up on classes and overburden themselves. We need to change the messaging to students about course loads.
The burden on faculty is steadily increasing, but MIT is not providing appropriate support for faculty to meet these new expectations.
Changes to MIT’s P/NR grading policies have allowed students to put off some GIRs until their junior or senior year, which I think is harmful. Those courses are meant to be foundational. I suggest restricting P/NR to the first and second year.
My undergraduate advisees want to take so many classes, which creates all sorts of problems. We need a limit to prevent overloading.
More and more, students want me to prepare them for tests rather than educate them. It’s disheartening.
The issue of Course 6 undergraduate enrollment continues to be a problem. I wish we could do more to make students aware of the many other fields of study available to them and the career prospects those disciplines present.
MIT should set a goal of eliminating undergraduate tuition.
Unionization is one of the most important issues for graduate students.

Faculty and staff are saying…

The faculty observers are a real strength in the negotiation process.
It will be critical to bring graduate students and faculty and staff closer together once a contract is in place.
Coming out of the union negotiations, a big community hug would be great. We'll want to reconnect with our graduate students.
MIT should make a serious and substantial fundraising effort to raise central endowed funds for graduate students.
There’s rising concern among our faculty about the impact of graduate student unionization on MIT’s mission. Faculty lack managerial tools to navigate the new reality of a unionized student body.
Create more of a baseline of financial support for grad students from the center, and then tell individual departments or PIs that they’ll need to provide funding beyond a certain level. Faculty are afraid of a lapse in funding.
The cost of living at MIT and in Cambridge is a major concern.
The cost of housing for graduate students is core to the long-term competitiveness of the Institute.
The growth in the graduate student body has put enormous pressure on housing and facilities.
Students have a lot of issues with the quality of life in the dorms.
Many students are forced to choose where to live based on financial fit instead of community fit.
Food insecurity is an issue. People are choosing to skip meals because they don’t have the money or the time. And the average price of a meal on a meal plan is a real area of concern.
Rent accounts for a huge percentage of grad students’ stipends. It’s not sustainable.
I’d appreciate better communications on all things related to housing.
The partners of grad students living in MIT housing are often excluded from important emails. We often don’t know what’s going on.
We have a really strong relationship with the administration when it comes to housing. There are a lot of MIT staff who are invested in our wellbeing, and we appreciate that.
Students value unique dorm cultures, but it can be hard for the administration to manage so many different systems of governance.
The best ideas in housing—like the pod program during Covid—result from meaningful collaboration between students and the administration.
With the intense academic pressures we face as undergrads, dorms are essential for getting the peer support we need.
Dining remains a serious issue. The minimum swipes for meal plans keep rising, and it’s often not feasible to get back to our dorms to use those swipes during the day. It would be great if we could use our swipes at the cafes on campus.
We’re missing a reasonably priced grocery store nearby. And although LaVerde’s was expensive, it was at least there for us in a pinch. It will leave a serious gap in our dining landscape. This is a huge concern.
TechMart—the at-cost grocery store MIT piloted a few years ago—was a good idea, but it wasn’t exactly what we need. The hours of operation weren’t right, it didn’t have fresh produce, and most students didn’t even know it was there. It’s worth revisiting.
FSILGs help people find their communities. They’re vital for positioning students to support one another.
Because of the house closures during Covid, FSILGs are dealing with a loss of historical knowledge. We’re working to re-build the knowledge base and reconnect with alumni.
Food insecurity is a huge problem for students, especially during IAP. Vending machines and the dining plans are expensive.
I wish MIT would do more to subsidize housing for junior faculty or provide local housing. We’re at a competitive disadvantage.
MIT needs available, affordable housing for trainees, especially grad students and postdocs.
Undergrads have a lot of support with mental health. For grad students, we’re kind of left to figure things out on our own.
With such a large first-generation-to-college population, undergrads feel immense pressure to succeed academically and financially and to send money home. This can present serious mental health challenges.
Think about academics and mental health together. Mental health is affected by academic pressures. Examples include extra homework over long weekends and issues with grading transparency.
Mental health services at MIT are always booked. It can be hard to get an appointment. The delay between outreach and an appointment is way too long.
We need more private spaces on campus to be able to have a private video chat for a mental health appointment.
Students are asking for lots of accommodations and flexibility with their assignments. They have legitimate reasons for the requests, but I’m worried about sending our students off into the working world when they need—and expect—so much support. You can’t always ask for an extension from your boss.
Many of our websites, apps, and student systems are really old. It’s definitely time for a refresh.
MIT should return to building its own IT systems rather than buying them.
We’re always being asked to do more with less. We have enough staff to just barely get the job done. When someone leaves, we’re often asked to do the job of two or three. It’s too much.
Staff would benefit from greater opportunities for professional development.
Staff compensation is inadequate.
MIT needs a system that does more to reward high performers and that creates opportunities for advancement.
Without the staff, this Institute wouldn’t exist.
We’re here because we love MIT and we want to help you, but you have to promote us.
Faculty don’t necessarily have the skillsets they need to be leaders. Do more to train faculty when they move into leadership roles.
Our IT and administrative systems are so old. They’re being upgraded, which is great, but we’re often not engaged until the systems are in place, and then it’s too late to make a change.
We’re struggling with recruitment and retention.
Underrecovery is a problem. However you decide to fix it, there will be a tradeoff that you’ll need to explain clearly.
There’s a huge problem in the way research overhead works here. Funders that want to support our work face too many barriers. This affects us deeply.
We’re facing an increased burden from federal regulation, and MIT’s administrative infrastructure hasn’t kept up. The time we spend attending to research administration issues takes us away from education and research.
Graduate students are very costly at MIT; government funding falls short of being able to cover these costs.
Core research facilities need to be improved.
The price of doing research at MIT is becoming prohibitive.
We need to refocus fundraising on basic research, not just applied research.
It bothers me that MIT is so engineering lopsided. Don’t make engineering smaller, but give more resources to the other fields. Ultimately, we’re educating students who will invent the world of tomorrow. We can only do that by better resourcing disciplines like the humanities, ethics, and arts.
Faculty and students don’t believe we have financial constraints. We see a disconnect between the size of the endowment and all the needs we still have. Do more to explain how MIT’s finances work.
Over the last 10-15 years, MIT has moved from being supportive and enabling to creating administrative barriers.
To make progress in medical research, especially using AI, we need greater access to medical data. MIT would benefit from a central data hub with all of the legal issues worked out at a higher level.
We had hoped that the college would enhance research computing across campus, and we are now told that this was not the purpose of the college. I hope that the new ORCD effort will meet those needs.
There aren’t enough support staff in SHASS to get things done, and we don’t have the resources to hire.
We need a simpler process, and more support, for securing grants. We have to jump through too many hoops.
So much knowledge about how MIT works is tied to individuals, not offices. When someone leaves, there’s an information void.
MIT’s policies for promotion aren’t clear, and I don’t know who I can ask to gain a better understanding of what’s required of me to advance.
As a research scientist, I do the same things assistant and associate professors do—research, teaching, supervising, advising—but I can’t sign a grant proposal that I’ve written because I’m not a PI. It’s embarrassing. I feel like a second-class citizen.
I’d appreciate it if MIT would offer training in how to write grant proposals.
Compensation for postdocs is an issue.
If you want to encourage more women to become postdocs, you need to provide more support for daycare. Even if I could afford daycare at MIT, the waiting list is so long.
Issues such as privilege, rules for promotion, and options for retirement are undefined for these roles.
You’ll be successful if students feel listened to and heard.
Leadership needs to be more visible on campus.
Unity. Schools feel more isolated from each other than they used to.
Lead with integrity and a commitment to healing.
A re-commitment to undergraduate education and a serious rethinking of the GIRs.
A meaningful contribution to solving the climate crisis.
Let the community see you more as a person. Doing more things like the video after the flyer incident will help bridge gap between the faculty and administration.
Lift us up and help us do things that we can’t do on our own. A hands-off approach to administration at MIT has historically worked, but that’s not what’s needed now.
Return us to being a family, not just a collection of schools and departments.
Success in this moment would look like revitalizing our communities, bringing us all together in a way that honors and connects our many constituencies.

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Machine learning
Sustainability
Black holes
Classes and programs

Departments

Aeronautics and Astronautics
Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Architecture
Political Science
Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
Lincoln Laboratory
School of Architecture + Planning
School of Engineering
School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
Sloan School of Management
School of Science
MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

In the Media

Joel Brown reports for The Boston Globe on the new Innovations of Cambridge tour, which features several research labs at MIT. “It leaves them with the feeling that they’ve experienced MIT in a way that the casual person wandering the streets would not,” explains guide Daniel Berger-Jones.