trek navigator 300 red

Brochures | Price Lists and Values | Trek History | Trek Timeline | Serial Numbers Component Dates | Gallery | Contact | Buy/Sell Suggestions Refurbish/Upgrade | Bike Resources | Home

*Trek is a trademark of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, WI

All copyrights in the TREK brochures, pricelists, owner's manuals and photographs displayed on this website are the sole property of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, Wisconsin.

All materials in this site not copyrighted by others are Copyright © 2001-2015 Skip Echert Web Associates , All rights reserved.

Trek Navigator 300 Bike: Comfort, Versatility, and Value (2024)

By: Author Mutasim Sweileh

Posted on Last updated: February 28, 2024

This site is supported by our readers. We may earn a commission, at no cost to you, if you purchase through links.

This exceptional bicycle is designed to conquer various terrains while keeping you comfortable every mile of the way. With its ergonomic design, customizable features, and smooth ride quality, this bike is perfect for casual rides with family or exploring new paths on your own.

Get ready to experience ultimate comfort and freedom with the Trek Navigator 300!

Table Of Contents

Key Takeaways

Design and features, target audience and usage, specifications and components, comfort and ergonomics, versatility and suitability for various terrains, customization options, weight and agility, efficiency and speed limitations, technological outdatedness, ideal usage scenarios, pros and cons of the bike, recommendations for specific purposes, pricing and affordability, longevity and maintenance, comparison with other models on the market, how does the trek navigator 300 compare to other comfort-hybrid style bikes on the market, can the trek navigator 300 be used for off-road trails and mountain biking, is the trek navigator 300 suitable for riders of all heights and body types, what is the average lifespan of the trek navigator 300 with regular maintenance, are there any specific accessories or add-ons recommended for the trek navigator 300 to enhance its performance or comfort.

• The Trek Navigator 300 is a comfort-hybrid bike that is suitable for cruising on smooth dirt paths and asphalt roads.
• The Navigator 300 has an Alpha aluminum frame, a 50mm suspension fork, 26 x 1.95-inch Bontrager tires, and an 8-speed SRAM drivetrain.
• The strengths of the Navigator 300 include its well-designed ergonomics, versatile performance across various terrains, and capacity for customizations.
• The weaknesses of the Navigator 300 include its weight, which can make it feel less agile on hills and more difficult to handle compared to lighter bikes. It may also not be as efficient for long distances or high speeds due to its design prioritizing comfort over pedaling efficiency. Additionally, it lacks modern features such as disc brakes, which are becoming increasingly common in newer models.

Overview of the Trek Navigator 300

We’ll analyze the target demographic this model aims to serve, typical usage scenarios, and intended riding surfaces.

Finally, we’ll explore the Navigator 300’s specifications, from its lightweight Alpha aluminum frame to the Shimano drivetrain and Bontrager tires that enable accessible performance for casual rides.

When reviewing the Trek Navigator 300, you’ll notice its comfort-hybrid style built on an aluminum frame with:

• 26 x 2-inch tires
• 50mm of front suspension
• A suspension seatpost
• 50mm riser bars

That make it suitable for cruising on smooth dirt paths and asphalt roads. The design innovation of this bike prioritizes user comfort with features such as:

• An upright riding position
• A cushioned seat

Technological upgrades like the suspension system enhance riding performance by minimizing impact from bumps. Additionally, customization options allow riders to personalize their biking experience according to their preferences.

You’ll find the Navigator 300 suits riders seeking comfort across various surfaces, as it excels during casual rides with family and friends while also handling outings to the beach.

This versatile bike prioritizes comfort over speed, making it ideal for leisurely rides and exploring different terrains.

With its ergonomic design and adjustable features, the Trek Navigator 300 caters to a wide range of targeted demographics who value comfort, versatility, and ease of use.

Whether you’re cruising around town or enjoying scenic routes, this entry-level bike offers a great value proposition for your cycling needs.

As we delve deeper into the Trek Navigator 300, let’s now explore its key specifications and components.

This comfort-focused hybrid bike features an Alpha aluminum frame paired with a 50mm suspension fork that enables it to absorb impacts smoothly across various surfaces.

It comes equipped with 26 x 1.95 inch Bontrager tires to further enhance shock absorption while providing good traction.

The 8-speed SRAM drivetrain offers reliable shifting performance.

Overall, the Navigator 300’s specifications indicate a design catered towards versatility, durability, and maximized comfort during rides.

Strengths of the Trek Navigator 300

• Well-designed ergonomics that promote comfort during rides.
• Versatile performance across various terrains.
• Capacity for customizations like mounting racks or baskets to enable specialized usage.

These qualities make the Navigator 300 a flexible and enjoyable bike for casual rides on roads or dirt paths, though it falls short for competitive or long distance cycling where efficiency is paramount.

Let’s explore the specifics around this model’s comfort, versatility, and customization potential that contribute to its strengths as a recreational cruiser.

Experience optimal comfort and ergonomic design with the Trek Navigator 300 bike.

• Upright position eases strain
• Wide, cushioned saddle
• Suspension seatpost
• Shock-absorbing front suspension
• 2-inch wide tires
• Swept-back handlebars
• Customizable mountings
• Fenders and racks installable
• Accessorize for personal needs

When riding the Trek Navigator 300, you’ll appreciate its versatility and suitability for various terrains.

Its wide tires provide good grip and traction across:

• Paved paths
• Unpaved trails
• Rail trails

The comfortable seat supports long rides while the suspension fork absorbs shocks for a smooth experience across mixed surfaces.

As an affordable bike with versatile performance across multiple terrains, the Navigator 300 offers outstanding value.

You can mount racks, fenders, and baskets to customize your Navigator 300 for hauling capacity or foul weather protection.

Here are three customization options that enhance the versatility of your bike:

• Front Rack: Attach a front rack to carry additional gear or groceries, increasing the bike’s carrying capacity.
• Water Bottle Cage: Install a water bottle cage for easy access to hydration during rides.
• Rear Rack: Add a rear rack to transport larger items or attach panniers for extra storage space.

With these customization options, you can tailor your Trek Navigator 300 according to your specific needs and preferences while enjoying its comfort and versatility on various terrains.

Weaknesses of the Trek Navigator 300

Firstly, its weight of around 33 lbs can make it feel less agile on hills and more difficult to handle compared to lighter bikes.

Additionally, the bike may not be as efficient for long distances or high speeds due to its design prioritizing comfort over pedaling efficiency.

Lastly, in terms of technology, the Navigator 300 lacks modern features such as disc brakes which are becoming increasingly common in newer models.

One major weakness of the Trek Navigator 300 is its weight, which significantly affects its agility on various terrains.

Weighing around 35 lbs, this bike isn’t as lightweight as some other models in its class.

The aluminum frame provides durability but adds to the overall weight of the bike.

As a result, maneuverability and speed may be compromised, making it slower and less efficient compared to lighter bikes.

The Trek Navigator 300’s weight poses a challenge when it comes to agility on different terrains.

With an approximate weight of 35 lbs (15.8 kg), this comfort-hybrid bike falls on the heavier side compared to other models in its category that weigh around 26 lbs (11-12 kg).

While comfort is prioritized with features like an upright riding position and suspension system for reduced impact, such a heavy build can make it slow and inefficient when navigating hills or uneven surfaces.

The aluminum frame used in the construction of the Trek Navigator contributes significantly to its overall weight but also ensures durability for long-lasting performance .

However, this added heft can become apparent during rides where quick acceleration or responsive handling are required.

When considering factors like uphill climbs or negotiating tight turns at higher speeds, riders might experience limitations due to these additional pounds carried by their bicycle’s frame.

The Navigator 300 sacrifices pedaling efficiency and speed for the sake of prioritizing comfort.

Its heavy build makes accelerating sluggish, while the limited gear range constrains speed.

The outdated rim brakes prove inconsistent across conditions.

Overall, it simply isn’t designed for high speeds or long distances, instead emphasizing versatility, affordability, and a smooth ride for leisurely weekend cruising with friends and family.

This bike lacks modern features like disc brakes.

• No disc brakes, relying on outdated rim brakes
• Heavier frame and components reduce efficiency
• Slower and less versatile than newer hybrid models

The dated technology makes the Navigator 300 less efficient and versatile compared to more modern hybrid bikes. However, its simple and proven design appeals to riders seeking a basic, durable bike for casual cruising rather than high performance.

Despite its technological limitations, the Navigator 300 retains charm and value for leisurely rides.

Riding Experience and Suitability

First, let’s look at its ideal usage scenarios. This bike is well-suited for casual rides, light commuting, and leisurely cycling thanks to its comfortable upright riding position and versatile features.

However, it may not be suitable for long-distance or high-speed rides due to its heavier weight and less efficient pedaling efficiency.

Despite these limitations, there are still recommendations we can make based on specific purposes such as emphasizing the lightweight frame for easy maneuverability or highlighting the suspension system’s shock-absorbing capability.

You’d be suited to take the Navigator 300 out for leisurely neighborhood spins or running local errands given its cruiser design emphasizing comfort over speed. It’s perfect for casual rides around the urban areas, whether you’re commuting to work or just exploring your city.

The bike can also handle light off-road adventures on gravel trails and provide a smooth ride along the beach boardwalk.

Whether it’s fitness riding or family leisure time, this versatile bike has got you covered!

When riding it, you’ll appreciate the Navigator 300’s comfort and versatility but may find limitations in speed and efficiency.

• Durability from its aluminum frame allows longevity if properly maintained.
• Upright riding position enhances comfort during rides.
• Tires grip well on multiple terrains like smooth dirt or asphalt.
• Budget-friendly price range, typically $100-$150 used.
• Fenders and racks can be added for versatility.

Your purpose-specific recommendations include using its cruiser design for neighborhood jaunts or its ruggedness for gravel paths while avoiding extended distances that diminish its comfort.

The Trek Navigator 300 is a versatile bike suitable for various riding experiences.

For commuting and short trips around the neighborhood, this comfortable bike provides an enjoyable ride .

If you’re looking to venture off-road, it offers the durability needed for gravel riding.

However, keep in mind that it may not be ideal for long treks due to potential discomfort caused by prolonged rides on less forgiving terrain.

Overall, this hybrid bike offers great value and versatility .

Value Assessment and Considerations for Purchase

Firstly, pricing and affordability play a crucial role in determining whether this bike is worth its cost.

Additionally, longevity and maintenance should be taken into account to ensure that your investment will last for years to come.

Lastly, it’s important to compare the Navigator 300 with other models on the market to determine if it offers competitive features and benefits at its price point.

By evaluating these points thoroughly, you can make an informed decision about purchasing the Trek Navigator 300 bike.

Considering the pricing and affordability of the Trek Navigator 300 bike, it offers good value for most buyers given its budget-friendly price range of $100-150 in local markets. Though pricing depends on the bike’s condition, it generally provides quality at an affordable cost.

However, be vigilant about potential seller misrepresentation to avoid overpaying or needing a partial refund, especially for a teenage bike purchase.

To ensure the longevity and optimal performance of your Trek Navigator 300 bike, regular maintenance and proper care are essential.

The bike is built with a durable steel frame or lightweight aluminum frame that resists rust and provides stability.

Its components are designed to be durable, ensuring reliable shifting for smooth rides.

With easy maintenance requirements, including long-lasting tires and front suspension for added comfort, the Trek Navigator 300 offers an easy riding experience that lasts.

When weighing your Navigator’s value, it’s worth comparing similar bikes like Raleigh’s comfort-cruiser models and Giant’s relaxed hybrids that compete in affordability and intended use.

Consider the weight, agility, efficiency, speed capabilities of these bikes.

Also take into account the technological outdatedness of certain models compared to the Trek Navigator 300.

Ultimately, price and affordability should be considered along with longevity and maintenance requirements when making a purchasing decision for bike paths or road biking adventures .

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

When comparing the Trek Navigator 300 to other comfort-hybrid style bikes, you’ll find its lightweight aluminum frame and upright riding position offer superior comfort for casual rides.

Its versatility and affordability make it a great choice in this category.

The Navigator 300 isn’t designed for mountain biking or off-road trails .

Its heavier build and limited gearing constrain it to flat urban areas and paved roads.

For rugged terrain, consider more capable mountain bikes tailored to handle tough conditions.

The Trek Navigator 300 is a versatile ride, accommodating riders of all heights and body types.

Its adjustable seat and ergonomic design ensure comfort for everyone, fostering a sense of belonging on every journey.

With proper maintenance, the Trek Navigator 300 can last over a decade.

Regular tune-ups and part replacements as needed will keep it rolling smoothly for years of enjoyable riding.

Care for it well and this trusty bike will serve you admirably.

Certainly, adding a rear rack, fenders, or basket can expand the Navigator 300’s utility for commuting or hauling gear. Upgrading to wider tires may also enhance comfort on rough surfaces. Overall though, it’s a versatile bike even in its stock form.

To summarize, the Trek Navigator 300 is a remarkable bike that offers comfort, versatility, and great value.

Its ergonomic design and customizable features ensure a comfortable ride every time, while its ability to conquer various terrains makes it suitable for any adventure.

Although it may have some limitations in terms of weight and speed, its overall performance and suitability for different purposes make it a top choice.

With its affordable price and long-term durability , the Trek Navigator 300 is a fantastic option for anyone seeking a reliable and enjoyable biking experience.

Related Posts

Trek FX 1 Review: Ultimate Guide to Choosing Your Hybrid Bike (2024)

Nishiki a Good Bike Brand? Pros & Cons of Nishiki Bikes (Quality, Value & Types 2024)

Is Nashbar a Good Value Bike Brand? Quality and Components Reviewed (2024)

Is Nishiki a Good Bike Brand in 2023? Quality and Value Review (2024)

Trek Fuel EX Vs Top Fuel: Unleashing the Power of Iconic Mountain Bikes (2024)

Why Isn’t My Bike Pump Working? A Comprehensive Guide (2024)

Trek Navigator 300 Review 2022 ?

It’s not often that you find a comfort bike with the toughness and versatility of an MTB. Luckily, the Trek Navigator 300 is one of those rare choices. So, this Trek Navigator 300 review will unpack this comfort bike’s best features and weigh them against their worst.

Generally, Trek Navigator 300 promises durable components and lots of comforts, living up to the title ‘comfort.’ It’s the kind of bike you can ride around town, run errands with, go to work with or cycle for fitness with.

So, have you been looking for an all-around comfort or hybrid bike for your everyday use?

Then the chances are that what you’ve been searching for is the Navigator 300. This review shall help you decide if that is the case.

Trek Navigator 300 Review – Table Summary

About trek navigator 300.

Trek Navigator 300 is a comfort bike (or hybrid bike) with many mountain bike specs. An adjustable headset, robust aluminum frame, suspension fork, and multi-surface tires are among them.

This bike was initially released in 1999 but discontinued in 2006 after eight generations.

Navigator 300 is generally a budget comfort bike, given that it cost under $500.

Plus, it’s relatively lightweight, averaging 30-35 pounds, depending on generation. Overall, the newest generations are lighter than the oldest generations.

But other than the weights, nothing much has changed over the years. Trek has maintained the design and the specs throughout.

Though Trek no longer makes the comfort bike, there is still a considerable stock size for those commuters who cannot afford high-end Trek hybrid bikes.

Trek Navigator 300 Specs

Though Navigator 300 is available in 8 generations, they all share these specifications:

1. Alpha Aluminum Frame

Trek’s Alpha aluminum frame technology produces aluminum frames that carbon frames can only match in strength and weight. These frames have higher tensile strength, making them the best for all bikes.

Lucky for Navigator 300 fans, the hybrid bike features this frame. So, you can count the bike for a lightweight feel, which is about 30 pounds for the newest models.

You can also count it for extra strength. So, whether you want to haul stuff or are just overweight, this commuter bike can hold your weight.

2. 26-Inch Wheels

Navigator 300 features traditional MTB’s 26-inch wheels with exceptional rims and tires.

Starting with the rims, they are made from aluminum Alex material, which is stronger than regular aluminum and enjoys 14g stainless steel spokes which improve the wheel strength.

Its tires are 1.95 inches wide, thus narrow enough for fast rolling on urban roads, making the bikes the ultimate urban commuter choice.   

The tires also come in a hard case Bontrager profile, which is also naturally tougher to allow you to take on the aggressive off-road. Thanks to their hard case profile, these tires won’t puncture easily despite their narrow profiles.    

3. SRAM 8-Speed Drivetrain

Trek Navigator 300 comes with a top-tier SRAM drivetrain. It’s both durable and high-performing.

You can count on its 8-speed shifters for smooth, quick, and confident shifting on urban roads.

You can also count on its SRAM 8-speed 8-32 cassette to help you take on the hills and long stretches.

Overall, very few bikes of such a budget can match Navigator 300 in climbing, down-hilling, or sprinting.

4. Suspension Saddle and Seat Post

This comfort bike is all about comfort, just as the name suggests. Essentially, that depends on its saddle and seat post. Navigator 300 comes with a broad and cushy saddle with spring suspension to cushion you against aggressive road vibrations.

Even better, the seat post also comes with suspension to cushion you against the bumps. The two features work cohesively to offer you a smoother riding experience,

5. Linear Pull Brakes

Sadly, navigator 300 doesn’t come with the ever-reliable disc brakes. Instead, it comes with linear-pull brakes that are cheaper to replace. Linear pull brakes are also decent in performance in dry and smoother conditions.   

Sadly, they are not the best for wet conditions and where the roads are too rough or dusty. So, if you are looking for an ultimate off-road beast, count Navigator 300 out. It’s only best for the perfect urban roads.

6. Upright Handlebar with Adjustable Stem

Navigator 300 comes with a flat bar with a 50mm rise that enables you to take an upright position. Such a position is gentler on your back. The best part is that its stem is adjustable to improve your back comfort.

Other Features of the Trek Navigator 300 Hybrid

This comfort bike also comes with the following features:

• Bell – What’s a commuter bike without a bell? Navigator 300 features a bell on its handlebar to warn other road users when riding on city roads.
• Chainring guard – This feature protects the chain from catching onto things and slipping off the chainring.
• 50mm suspension fork – Though its suspension doesn’t offer you much travel, it’s enough to soak up small bumps on city roads.
• Dual-density platform pedals – The pedals design makes pedaling seamless and comfortable.

Trek Navigator 300 Generations

Trek Navigator 300 comes in 8 different generations, which stretch from 1999 to 2006. They are as follows:

• 1999 Navigator 300
• 2000 Navigator 300
• 2001 Navigator 300
• 2002 Navigator 300
• 2003 Navigator 300
• 2004 Navigator 300
• 2005 Navigator 300
• 2006 Navigator 300

Overall, Trek has maintained the specs and the designs throughout the generations. The only different things have been the frame colors and weight. The newest generations tend to weigh much less than the older generations,

Trek Navigator 300 Weight

Though these bikes have become lighter as you move from one older generation to another, they average 30-35 pounds. From a comfort bike’s standards, that’s relatively lightweight.

Overall, its lighter weight is because of its alpha aluminum frames and aluminum Alex rims, which generally improve your cycling comfort.

Trek Navigator 300 Frame Warranty

Trek includes limited lifetime coverage of the bike frame as it does on every other bike. The coverage protects the bike frame from faulty workmanship for a lifetime.

So, that proves that the frame is high-quality and dependable for as long as you shall own the comfort bike.

Trek Navigator 300 Size Chart

Trek Navigator 300 comes in four different frame sizes. Here’s a chart to use when shopping for this comfort bike.

Trek Navigator 300 Cost

Since launching in 1999, Navigator 300 has never cost more than $500. Depending on the generation, this comfort bike retails at $400-$500.

By Trek’s standards, the price is quite a bargain, more so if you consider the specs it promises. I’m talking about an alpha aluminum frame, SRAM drivetrain, suspension seat post, to name a few.

Trek Navigator 300 Review Pros and Cons

• Relatively lightweight
• Stronger tires
• Multi-surface hard-case tires
• Lifetime frame warranty
• Suspension seat and seat post
• Budget-friendly
• Upright geometry
• Reliable drivetrain
• More durable components
• Its linear-pull brakes are not the most reliable
• Its petals are low quality
• It only comes with 50mm travel, which is not enough for big bumps

Is Trek Navigator 300 Worth It?

Trek Navigator 300 may not be the most high-end comfort bike by Trek, but it has several specs similar to what you find on most high-end Trek comfort bikes.

That includes its alpha aluminum frame, seat suspension, and SRAM drivetrain. And given that it cost under $500, there is no doubt that its price is a bargain.

So, yes, Navigator 300 is worth getting and worth paying for if you are a commuter, recreational cyclist, or fitness enthusiast on a budget.

Who Should Get Trek Navigator 300?

Any urban commuter can get Navigator 300, regardless of experience level. The bike, however, suits entry-level budget commuters more.

You can dash with it to school or work as long as you ride it on smoother roads.

This comfort bike is also best for casual riding, running errands, fitness cycling, and family Sunday rides. Provided you ride on urban roads, you’ll be okay.

Overall, it doesn’t mean that you cannot ride it off-road as it has multi-surface tires. However, riding it off-road, especially regularly, will only wear down the tires.

Besides, the tires are not wide enough, thus unfit for the off-road.

Who Shouldn’t Get Trek Navigator 300?

While Navigator 300 is undeniably a budget choice for urban commuters, it is not as fast as a road bike. That means it doesn’t suit racers.

And while it has multi-surface tires, it doesn’t have enough suspension travel to take on the hills. So, it’s not best for mountain cyclists.

It’s also not best for trail riders as its linear-pull brakes are not the most reliable, and its tires are also slimmer thus less traction.

People Also Ask (About Trek Navigator 300 Bike Reviews)

1. when was the trek navigator 300 made.

Trek made the first Navigator 300 in 1999 but sadly discontinued the comfort bike line in 2006.

2. Does Trek Still Make Navigator 300?

Trek no longer makes Navigator 300. The company discontinued its large-scale production in 2006. Now, you can get Navigator 300 from 1999-2006 on Trek archives.

3. Where Are Trek Bikes Made?

80% of Trek bikes are made in Asia and Europe, while only 20% are made in the US. However, everything about the manufacturing is coordinated from their headquarters in Waterloo, Wisconsin, USA.

• Trek Dual Sport 2 Vs 3
• Trek Dual Sport 3 V 4

Closing Thoughts on the Trek Navigator 300 Review:

There is no denying that the Trek Navigator 300 is a fantastic budget comfort bike. So, whether you are a commuter, recreational biker, or just a fitness enthusiast, you cannot go wrong with this two-wheel.

It has the specs of a mountain bike that makes it hardy enough for the trails and has the sleeker look of a road bike, making it best for the city road.

Trek Navigator 300 2004 Technical specs and features

General specs of trek navigator 300 bicycle, wheels and breaking system, frame and body specifications, gearing specs, trek navigator 300 fork system data, other specs of trek navigator 300, trek navigator 300 picture, navigator 300 bike comparison.

Trek Navigator 300 VS Cannondale Adventure 600 HeadShok

Trek Navigator 300 VS Jamis Citizen 2.0 Womans

Trek Navigator 300 VS Diamondback Wildwood DLX

Trek Navigator 300 VS Norco Napoli

Trek Navigator 300 bike review

Trek produced the Navigator 300 bike in 2004 and can be classified as a Commuter bicycle, this exact model costs in american market arround $489.99. Navigator 300 bike is available in many sizes such as 14.5 (inches), 16.5 (inches), 18.5 (inches), 21 (inches), womens 14.5 (inches), womens 16.5 (inches) and womens 18.5 (inches). Trek Commuter Navigator 300 can be found in a few colors, among these colors Blue and Silver and Silver and Black Chrome . This bike is equiped with 26 x 1.95" Bontrager Comfort HC tires and Stainless steel spoke wheel while the rims are manufactured by Matrix 550, 32-hole. Trek equiped this exact model with Aluminum linear-pull brakes, aluminum linear-pull levers braking system and Front: aluminum, Q/R, Rear: Shimano HB-RM40 hubs. To guarantee the comfiest ride Trek used Aluminum material for the frame. Bontrager Bar-Keeper high strength material is used on the handlebar of this Navigator 300 to ensure the perfect handling while the stems are made of Aluminum threadless. For the smoothest biking experience Shimano C-203, 28/38/48 teeth is used on this bicycle linked to 1/2 x 3/32" chain that is easily replaceable as stated by Trek , the whole system is connected to a high reliability SRAM MRX gear shift levers.

• Get The best price of Trek Navigator 300
• Find Trek Navigator 300 parts and accessories

Trek Navigator 300 competitors

Diamondback

The Trek Navigator 300 is a mountain/commuter/comfort bike with an aluminum Alpha frame. The frame comes in colors like blue, black and silver.

Originally released in 1999, there are 8 versions of this bike. Due to the frame materials and other factors, we estimate that this bike weighs around 35 pounds. The Navigator 300 has fork suspension with 2-50in travel.

The Navigator 300 comes with various mountain bike components, including an aluminum, adjustable, threadless riser stem, a sealed, threadless, Victor VP-H992W, Threaded Slimstak Aheadset headset and grip-shift, Centera, Shimano SRAM shifters.

The Navigator 300 has 8 speeds and has a Shimano SRAM derailleur.

It comes with Bontrager Trek tires (26in x 1.95in) and metal matrix composite, aluminum, Weinmann 519, Vuelta Vision Alex rims.

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek Navigator 300 2002 Cruiser Bike

• USER REVIEWS

Quality, fit and finish and ease of maintenance.

None. Well I wish it had disc brakes, but you can't have everything at this price.

My wife bought the bike for me, so the price is only approximate. I am in the "geezer" range at 56 and had not ridden a bike for nearly 40 years. I have ridden my Trek nearly every day for seven months. It is fantastically comfortable, easy to ride and maintain. I highly reccomend it.

This bike simply feels like quality. You could spend more for developed trail riding, but you don't need to.

You could, I suppose, want better this or that, or both. But look at the price, the purpose, and the quality. There are no significant weaknesses.

As a rapidly ageing "baby boomer" I was looking for something to hold off the ravages of time. I found it. Bikes are as near to zero impact as is possible and still be outside. The 300 is the perfect tool if you're doing bikepath/rail-trail riding. The Navigator line is classified by Trek as "comfort bikes" and they are. The seating position is remarkably comfortable, yet you can work agressivly if you wish. Within the Navigator line I believe the 300 is the "sweet spot." This is no *mart special. It is a well engineered machine, almost "watch like" in its operation. I regularly do 40 mile weekend rides over a combination paved/packed sand and crushed limestone trail. I wish for nothing more than this bike. A large part of satisfaction with a bike is the shop you buy it from. My shop is just what you'd want, selling a great product. A good deal all around!

Similar Products Used:

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

Is the Trek Navigator 300 a Good Bike? (Let’s find out!)

Trek has consistently created high-quality bicycles for many years. One of these bicycles is the Trek Navigator 300 released from 1999-2006. Without a doubt, Trek’s modern bicycles are amazing, but how do older bicycles such as the Navigator Compare, and meet modern standards? Is the Trek Navigator 300 still a good bike?

Table of Contents

• 2 Who It’s For
• 3 Trek Navigator 300 Specs
• 4 Strengths
• 5 Weaknesses
• 6 How Much is the Trek Navigator 300 Worth?
• 7 Is the Trek Navigator 300 Worth buying in 2022-2023?

The Trek Navigator 300 is a comfort-hybrid style bicycle with an emphasis on control and comfort. Constructed on an aluminum frame, it comes with 26 x 2-inch tires, a 50mm front suspension, a suspension seatpost, and comfortable 50mm riser bars. This bike is a good all-rounder and can easily accommodate smooth dirt path riding, as well as asphalt roads. The Navigator 300 has reasonable build quality and is sure to last many years to come given that it’s looked after well. Although it is no longer produced, they’re often available used in local markets or bike shops for a steal of a deal.

Who It’s For

The Trek Navigator 300 is for riders who want a comfortable ride on many mixed surfaces ranging from dirt paths to asphalt roads. If you’re looking for a bike to ride to the beach or to ride casually with family and friends, this is an excellent choice that will get the job done.

The wide 2-inch tires work in harmony with the 50mm front fork, and suspension seatpost to create a smooth, cushy ride. In the front, the Navigator 300 comes with 50mm riser bars that not only give you excellent control and stability but lets your spine rest in a more ergonomic position.

If comfort is important to you, you should consider this bicycle. If you’re looking to ride long distances fast, this may not be the best option as it makes your pedaling less efficient and requires more energy. In that case, you may consider buying a road bike.

Trek Navigator 300 Specs

• Frame : Alpha Aluminum
• Fork : 50mm Spring
• Wheelset : Alloy front, Shimano RM60 rear hub; Alex alloy rims
• Tires : Bontrager Comfort Hardcase, 26×1.95″
• Shifters : SRAM MRX Pro, 8 speed
• Front derailleur : Shimano C102
• Rear derailleur : SRAM X-7
• Crank : Bontrager Sport 48/38/28 w/chainguard
• Cassette : SRAM PG830 11-32, 8 speed
• Pedals : Dual density platform
• Saddle : Bontrager Suburbia w/elastomer bumper, flashing lights
• Seatpost : Alloy adjustable suspension
• Handlebar : Alloy, 50mm rise
• Stem : Alloy, adjustable rise
• Headset : Threaded Slimstak w/semi-cartridge bearings, sealed
• Brakeset : Tektro V w/Tektro alloy levers, Kraton inserts, bell

The Trek Navigator is very versatile and is ready to tackle many different riding surfaces. From gravel and dirt to asphalt and sand, it will maintain a high level of control and maneuverability while still feeling comfortable. This is a bike that you could ride to the beach, and then along a sandy boardwalk with almost no hesitation.

Not only can the Navigator 300 handle a large variety of surfaces, but it can also double as a light commuting bike. It has many mounting points for racks, fenders, and baskets that will enhance your trip, increase your carrying capacity, and give your bike an extra customized feel. Fenders are a great way to stay dry and clean while riding after rainy weather.

Budget-Friendly

When compared to modern-day bikes with modern-day prices, the Navigator 300 boasts an unrivaled value. Although not available to buy new, they circulate local marketplaces for a price of anywhere between 100 – 150 USD and had an MSRP of 440 USD. At this price, the aluminum frame, wide tires, front fork, and 3×8 gearing setup are comparable to bikes that are three times the price. 

If you’re looking to cycle recreationally while avoiding some of the large price tags on bicycles, the Navigator 300 is a great choice that will give you those big price-tag features for a small tag price. 

A very essential part of any bike that can make or break the deal is the level of comfort that it provides. The Trek Navigator 300 was designed with ergonomics in mind, allowing riders to sit with their spine resting vertically. This is thanks to the 50mm high-rise handlebars. These handlebars lift your hands higher, naturally letting you sit straighter. If you have back issues, this is a common remedy that you might use.

Not only is the Navigator ergonomic, but it provides good all-around comfort. To dampen vibrations on rides for that cloud-like feel, the bike is equipped with a 50mm front fork, a suspension seatpost, and 2 Inch tires. 

Having wide tires on a bike is beneficial for many reasons. The Trek Navigator comes with 26 x 2-inch wide tires that provide comfort and control no matter what surface you’re on. Having wide tires increases the surface area of your tires that touches the ground. This gives you more grip, not only allowing you to feel more in control but making your ride safer. 

Wide tires also mean you can use less air in your tires, making your ride feel more cushy and soft. Another bonus is that you lower the chance of getting a tire puncture and cutting your ride short.

Along with all of the features that come on the Navigator 300 comes a lot of weight. Wide tires, suspension, a riser bar, and a suspension seatpost all come at the cost of weight. The Navigator comes in at around 33 lbs depending on the model and size. 

If you plan on using this bike to ride through hills or areas of changing elevation, you might want to consider a lighter bike. 33 lbs can make a big difference in a bike’s agility when accelerating or going up hills. However, if you don’t plan on riding a lot of hills, then this is an easily overlooked negative. 

Poor Efficiency

When it comes to riding long distances, durations, or just riding fast, the Trek Navigator 300 isn’t anyone’s first option. While the long, stretched-out ergonomic position allows you to feel comfortable on the bike, it can hinder your ability to produce power. A more leaned-over feel on a bike will be more efficient and leave you feeling like you have more left in the tank at the end of the day.

In addition, wide 2-inch tires increase rolling resistance, again making the bike less efficient than some other options. If you’re looking for a bike you can go long distances on, you may want to consider a road bike or a hybrid with a more aggressive leaned-over stance. 

Old Standards

With the Trek Navigator 300 being first released in 1999, and the last release being in 2006, cycling technology has evolved. New standards have come to life in the cycling world, one of which is disc brakes. The Navigator is equipped with rim brakes, which are less powerful and consistent.

When rain, mud, or even sand touches rim brakes, it can significantly lessen the stopping power of the brakes, and make your riding feel a little less predictable. Modern bikes are equipped with disc brakes which provide superior stopping power in all conditions.

How Much is the Trek Navigator 300 Worth?

The 2006 Trek Navigator originally retailed for 440 USD, but is now found in local marketplaces for anywhere between 100-150 USD. Often you can strike an even better deal on these bikes from yard sales and local forums. Keep in mind you may want to schedule the bike for a tune-up from your local bike shop after purchasing it to ensure a safety check-up is done.

At a price of 100-150 USD, you really can’t compare this bike to any new bike on the market, because it’s a fraction of the price for a whole lot of quality. The Trek Navigator 300 is a great value, so be sure to keep an eye on your local markets for one of these hidden gems. 

Is the Trek Navigator 300 Worth buying in 2022-2023?

The Trek Navigator is an affordable, versatile comfort cruiser that’s the perfect choice for those who want a comfortable bike for casual rides, but can handle some light commuting. This bike has an amazing value that will last you many years if you take care of it properly.

With 50mm of front suspension, 2-inch tires, a suspension seatpost, and ergonomic riser bars, the Navigator is a comfortable ride well suited for both smooth dirt paths, and asphalt roads. While you may not be winning Le Tour de France on this bike, you will love every second of riding it.

Sharing is caring!

Lisa Hayden-Matthews

• August 22, 2023
• No Comments

Related Posts

The ultimate beginner’s guide to mountain biking, who will insure electric bikes, what electric bikes are made in canada, can you use an electric bike like a normal bike, do you need disc brakes on an electric bike.

Subscribe To Our NewsLetter!

                           FINANCIAL & MEDICAL DISCLOSURE

The HobbyKraze is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.co.uk and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program. As their Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

The information written on this website is not medical advice, nor has it been endorsed by medical health professional(s). All content on this site is for informational purposes only.

We are independently owned and the opinions expressed here are our own

453, S Spring Street,  Ste 400 PMB1061

Los Angeles, CA 90013

Accounts Dept : [email protected]

General Enquiries: [email protected]

Publishers Relations: [email protected]

Tel:  +1 (213) 457-3776

Explore The World, Unleash Smart Hobbies & Increase The Zest For Life In You!

Site Structure         EarthlyChirp

©2023 HobbyKraze. All Rights Reserved.         

Trek Navigator 200- The Ultimate Review In 2022

Are you looking for a bike that is both versatile and comfortable? The Trek Navigator 200 could be the perfect option for you! This bike is ideal for both short and long rides, and it is also firm enough to handle rougher terrain. The removable seat and easy-to-use pedals make it easy to transport your bike wherever you go.

But is the Trek Navigator 200 worth your money? Let’s take a closer look at this review and find out what you need to know.

In this post, we will cover

• Review the specs of the Trek navigator 200 Bike.
• Regarding the pros and cons of the trek navigator 200 bike.
• Compare it to trek navigator 100 vs 200 and 200 vs 300 in its class.
• In-depth Review of Bike Materials ( Frame, Tire, Breaks, Gear, etc)
• List of all the trek 200 navigator Series Bike galleries from 1999 to 2006.
• Give you a verdict on whether or not this bike is right for you!

Table of Contents

Trek Navigator 200 Review

Trek Navigator 200 is a perfect mix of features and performance that any cyclist would love. With a sleek and lightweight Alpha Aluminum frame, Trek’s 50mm Navigator suspension system ensures a smooth ride that is sure to please.

You’ll appreciate the responsive handling that comes courtesy of the SRAM MRX Plus, 8-speed shifters, and Shimano RM60 rear hub, while the Tektro V w/Tektro alloy levers brakes will bring you to a safe stop in no time.

Whether you’re commuting to work or hitting the trails for some serious cycling fun, this bike is perfect for city riding or commuting as a general all-purpose bike.

Additionally, this bike comes with several innovative features that make it incredibly convenient and user-friendly. Now, are you ready to take a jump into this bike key feature? Keep reading!

Trek Navigator 200 Specs

Trek navigator 200 key features, trek navigator 200 pros and cons.

• In a muddy/wet condition, the tektro v – breaks are not reliable like disc brakes.

Trek 200 Navigator Price

The bike trek 200 navigator price is available for 380$.

The trek 200 navigator price comes with Shimano components which provide plenty of gears for different types of terrain, making this bike perfect for outdoor enthusiasts everywhere. However, you can buy second-hand from eBay or bicyclebluebook .

Schwinn MTB Bike- Best Alternative To Trek Navigator 200

How much does a trek navigator 200 weigh.

A trek navigator 200 weighs 30 pounds or 13.60kg . This bike is perfect for commuters who are looking for a comfortable ride that can handle a lot of weight. Not only is this bike lightweight and easy to transport, but it also features a suspension system that smooths out bumps on the road.

Additionally, the Aluminum Frame makes it sturdy and durable. The weight limit of this bike is 300 pounds or 136kg , so it can be used by anyone regardless of their weight or riding experience.

How Do I Know What Size Trek Bike To Get?

When buying a bike, the size you need is determined by your height and weight. So first ensure the bike is the right fit for you.

In this chart, you can able to determine what size frame will be best for your body height type.

Trek Navigator 200 Parts

Alpha aluminum frame.

The Navigator 200 crank is made from high-quality aluminum alloy that’s durable, lightweight and that has an efficient geometry for comfortable riding. It’s built with an upright riding position and a comfortable suspension to make it easy to ride even on rougher terrain. It offers great performance for a bike at this price point, with 8-speed shifters and derailleurs to make riding on any terrain easy.

The Navigator 200 Alpha Aluminum Frame size comes in 14.5, 16.5, 18.5, 21″; Lowstep 14, 16, 18.5″ Sizes . These 7 sizes fit most people comfortably. So whether you are experienced or just starting, this frame is perfect for you!

Trek Navigator 200 Wheels

Trek navigator 200 size 26” and Matrix 550 rims are a great way to improve the ride quality of your bike. In addition, they’re also compatible with most bike spacers to customize the ride even further!

They offer great stability while riding on uneven terrain or navigating through city streets. So whether you’re looking for a street bike or an off-road adventure, there’s a size to fit your needs.

Trek Navigator 200 Tires 

Trek navigator 200 tire size 26×1.95″ comes with a variety of benefits . They’re capable of standing the test of time, even over rough terrain and they roll great thanks to their dual compound. Plus, they’re designed for optimal road performance!

Overall, the Navigator 200 bike tires are a great option for riders who want a reliable and comfortable ride. It’s perfect for people who live in urban areas or want to commute on long or short trips.

Trek Navigator 200 Drivetrain

Navigator 200’s drivetrain features a 24-speed drivetrain that comes with 8-speeds. It works perfectly in most terrains, delivering precise and smooth shifting without any problems.

The drivetrain is also of a high-performance standard. Its Shimano Shimano C102 front derailleur and shifter, along with the Shimano Alivio rear derailleur, provide excellent shifting performance.

Trek Navigator 200 V-Brakes

The bike’s brakes are Tektro V-brakes which may be a party spoiler for those used to hydraulic and mechanical disc brakes. However, in dry conditions, they perform well enough. They do feel less powerful than the disc brakes on a mountain bike but are good enough for urban riding.

In wet or muddy conditions they don’t offer the same level of performance as mechanical or hydraulic disc brakes. Because it’s a comfort bike, you won’t have a problem bringing it to a halt on city streets.

Trek Navigator 200 Seatpost

The Seat Post on the trek navigator 200 bikes is of an alloy design, with adjustable rise for a comfortable and upright position. It also features a suspension system that works in conjunction with the saddle to absorb bumps comfortably.

All in all, the navigator 200 bike is a great option for riders who want a reliable and comfortable ride.

Trek Navigator 200 Suspension

The trek navigator 200 bike suspension system consists of a 50mm suspension that absorbs road vibration. This effectively enables you to take on bumpier roads comfortably even when there are many rough patches.

The height of the frame and the excellent suspension system both provide for a comfortable, upright riding position whether you’re commuting or out exploring scenic mountain trails.

Overall Discussion

Overall, the trek navigator 200 is a great bike for city commuters. It’s reliable, comfortable, and easy to ride, making it perfect for short trips around town or errands on your way to work. The suspension system ensures that you’re able to take on bumpy roads with ease, while the weight limit means that even those who are heavier or less experienced riders can use this bike without issues.

If you’re looking for a bike that will make your daily commutes more comfortable and easy, the trek navigator 200 is a great option to consider.

Trek 200 Performance

As the name suggests, the bike includes features that make it easy to navigate your way through difficult terrain. It is a versatile bike that can handle a variety of terrains, including trails, dirt roads, and even snow. This bike is excellent for commuting to work or for exploring new areas by bicycle.

It has been designed with comfort and convenience in mind, which means that you will be able to ride it all day without feeling exhausted. It has an adjustable suspension system that allows you to customize the level of comfort you experience while cycling. This makes it ideal for cycling adventures or any type of cycling.

The Trek navigator 200 also features Shimano C102 front and Shimano Alivio rear derailleurs, SRAM MRX Plus, 8-speed shifters, and Sure-Grip soles on both tires which provide excellent grip in all types of terrain. As mentioned earlier, the navigator 200 comes with an adjustable suspension system that provides great reliability when Cycle touring or tackling difficult trails.

Trek Navigator 200 Value

Trek Navigator 200 is a popular bike for everyday use and has a value that depends on the rider. At first glance, it may not seem like much different from other bikes in its class. However, there are some features and benefits that set this bike apart from the competition.

For one, Trek Navigator 200 is made with a lightweight aluminum frame that makes it easy to maneuver and ride. Additionally, the SRAM MRX Plus, the 8-speed transmission provides an amazing range of gears so you can explore your surroundings at your leisure without feeling rushed or uncomfortable. The saddle is also comfortable and supportive, making vigorous rides enjoyable instead of arduous.

last but not least, the Ride Control System provides accurate tracking data so you never have to worry about losing your bearings or going off course.

If you’re looking for an affordable option that still offers high-quality performance, then Trek Navigator 200 might be perfect for you!

Trek Navigator 200 Accessories

Here are list of trek navigator 200 accessories

• Tile lights
• Bike Locker

Trek Navigator 100 Vs Trek Navigator 200

Trek Navigator 200 Vs Trek Navigator 300

Conclusions 

Based on the review in this article, it’s clear that the trek navigator 200 comfort bike is well-made and this bike has been designed with commuters in mind and offers a lot of features. From the frame to the breaks and gears, we’ve covered everything you need to know about this bike.

Its overall price point makes it affordable for most riders, and its wide range of features ensures that there’s something for everyone. Check out our review of the Trek navigator 200 bikes!

FAQ’s

How much is a trek navigator 200.

The bike trek 200 navigator price is available for 380$.however you can buy a second-hand bike for under 200$.

What Kind Of Bike Is A Trek Navigator 200?

Trek navigator 200 is a comfortable commuter bike.

How Much Does A Trek Navigator Weigh?

A trek navigator 200 weighs 30 pounds or 13.60kg.

Trek Navigator For Casual Riding?

The Navigator is very nice and easy to ride in casual riding. So the trek navigator 200 bike is perfect for casual riding too

Are Trek Bikes Worth The Money?

Yes, trek bikes are definitely worth the money. The bike comes with a lot of features and is very comfortable to ride.

Trek Navigator 200 Related Resources

• Trek 820 Mountain Bike
• Trek 800 Mountain Bike
• Trek 850 Mountain Bike
• Trek 3700 Mountain Bike
• Trek 4300 Mountain Bike
• Trek 7000 Mountain Bike

Trek Navigator 200 Parts Diagram

Do you need a trek navigator 200 manual? If you’re thinking about purchasing or borrowing a Trek Navigator 200 bike, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the correct assembly and riding techniques. Fortunately, the supplied user manual is comprehensive and easy to follow.

However, you can get information Trek navigator 200 owners manual from Trek .

Trek Navigator 200 For Sale

• Trek navigator 200 retail prices 380$.
• Trek navigator 200 used price 151$-155$.However, you can buy a used bike or sale from eBay or bicyclebluebook.

Trek Navigator 200 Video

Trek Navigator 200 Bike Gallery

2000 trek navigator 200.

2001 Trek Navigator 200

2002 Trek Navigator 200

2003 Trek Navigator 200

2004 Trek Navigator 200

2005 Trek Navigator 200

2006 Trek Navigator 200

Trek Navigator 200 Red

Trek Navigator 200 Green

Trek Navigator 200 Blue

Similar Posts

Are Trek 7000 Mountain Bike Good? Analysis in 2022

Do you want to enjoy the great outdoors without having to worry about your bike being damaged? The Trek 7000 mountain bike is the perfect option for you! This bike is designed for mountain biking and is built to withstand the tough conditions that you would encounter on a mountain. Not only is this bike…

Are Trek 4300 Mountain Bike Good? Ultimate Analysis in 2022

Yes, Trek 4300 is a great bike for commuting because it is comfortable, efficient, and versatile. It is designed with an upright riding position that makes it easy to ride in all directions. The bike has a Shimano 9-speed drivetrain that offers a wide range of gears that is perfect for different types of terrain….

Are Trek 800 Mountain Bike Better? Ultimate Analysis in 2022

Yes,Trek 800 Mountain bike is great option. If you’re looking for an awesome mountain bike that is both versatile and reliable, then you should definitely consider investing in a Trek 800. It’s built with high-quality materials and features precise gearing to make climbing hills easy as pie. Plus, its lightweight frame makes it portable so…

Are Trek 3700 Mountain Bike Good?- Ultimate Analysis in 2022

Mountain biking is a great way to get in shape and have fun. But it can be hard to find the right bike for you. You don’t want a mountain bike that’s heavy, clunky, or too expensive. Trek 3700 has created an aluminum frame with disc brakes and 8-speed shifters so you can get out…

Are Trek 820 Mountain Bike Better? Ultimate Analysis

Yes, it is a great bike. It has excellent performance specs, a good comfortable riding position, and also a very smooth gear shifting system that will give you better efficiency in every ride. Surprisingly, this bike can hold up to a 300Lbs weight limit. For heavy riders, this is the best choice, to begin with….

Are Trek 850 Mountain Bike Good? Ultimate Analysis

If you’re looking for a great all-rounder that can take you anywhere you want to go, the trek 850 mountain bike is a perfect choice. This durable and well-made bike is perfect for tackling rugged trails and is built to last. Plus, its versatile design means that it can be used for a variety of…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trek Bikes – The world's best bikes and cycling gear

Back-to-back bike of the year

Slash – 2023 Bike of the Year

Fuel ex – 2022 bike of the year.

Screen Rant

Star trek: discovery season 5 finale ending & shocking epilogue explained.

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Star Trek: Discovery Season 5 Returning Cast & New Character Guide

I agree with captain burnham's decision about star trek: discovery season 5's treasure, discovery’s ending sets a star trek record & creates 2 new admirals.

Warning: SPOILERS for Star Trek: Discovery's Season 5 & Series Finale - "Life, Itself"

• Captain Burnham makes a pivotal choice to banish the Progenitors' technology for the greater good of the galaxy.
• USS Discovery's epic battle against the Breen pays homage to Star Trek: The Next Generation with a saucer separation.
• The finale hints at a future for Admiral Burnham and the USS Discovery, leaving the door open for potential sequels or movies.

Star Trek: Discovery 's stunning season 5 and series finale concludes the hunt for the greatest treasure in the galaxy, and the extended finale's emotional epilogue finally answers one of Discovery 's biggest questions as it says goodbye to Captain Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green) and her crew. Written by Kyle Jarrow and Michelle Paradise and directed by Olatunde Osunname, Star Trek: Discovery 's finale, "Life, Itself", sees Captain Burnham make a pivotal choice about the Progenitors' treasure while the USS Discovery defeats the Breen.

Captain Burnham competed with Moll (Eve Harlow) for the Progenitors' technology, but it could only be Michael who could access it as she passed every test that came with the Progenitors scientists' clues . Burnham met one of the Progenitors (Somkele Iyamah-Idhalama) who revealed Michael was to be the new steward of the Progenitors' technology, as Betazoid scientist Dr. Marina Derex was when she found it in the 24th century. Meanwhile, Ambassador Saru (Doug Jones) faced down Breen Primarch Tahal (Patricia Summersett) while Commander Rayner (Callum Keith Rennie) led the USS Discovery to keep the Breen dreadnought from reaching the portal to the Progenitors' technology. Here's how Star Trek: Discovery ended and what it all meant.

As Burnham seeks the universe's greatest treasure in Star Trek: Discovery season 5, she'll need help from a host of new and returning characters.

Why Captain Burnham Sends The Progenitors’ Technology Away

Star trek already has "infinite diversity in infinite combinations".

The Progenitor gave Captain Burnham the choice of what to do with the power of creation, and Michael decided that no one culture should control it. Instead, Burnham decided to send the Progenitors' portal into the binary black holes' event horizon to keep it safe and unreachable. Michael's decision was born from the fact that she didn't want the responsibility of being the technology's steward but, more importantly, Burnham realized Star Trek 's galaxy already has "infinite diversity in infinite combinations". Control of the technology, even by the United Federation of Planets, would ultimately lead to abuse, war, and death.

The Progenitor revealed that the technology is older than they were and that their species found it and decided to use it to populate the galaxy with myriad humanoid lifeforms because their species was alone in the universe.

As she exited the Progenitors' dimension, Captain Burnham witnessed four billion years of creation and everything that led to the galaxy's existence. This solidified Michael's choice to banish the power of creation. Tragically for Moll, the Progenitor revealed to Burnham that while the technology could resurrect L'ak (Elias Toufexis) physically, it can't restore his memories or his personality . Burham and Moll returned to the USS Discovery where Moll was taken into custody. Burnham told her crew that she would speak to President Laira Rillak (Chelah Horsdal) and Admiral Charles Vance (Oded Fehr) about her choice to banish the power of creation, and she felt that they would agree. Ultimately, Burnham was empowered by the Progenitor and made the unilateral decision she felt was right for the galaxy.

Moll too willingly accepted Burnham's explanation that there was no way to resurrect L'ak, but it's possible Moll was fed her own information when she tried and failed to access the Progenitors' technology.

USS Discovery Beat The Breen With A Star Trek: TNG Enterprise Tribute

Discovery did a saucer separation.

As Ambassador Saru and Commander Nhan (Rachael Ancheril) tried to ward Primarch Tahal from entering the battle for the Progenitors' portal, the USS Discovery was still outmatched by the Breen dreadnought. Cleveland Booker (David Ajala) and Dr. Hugh Culber (Wilson Cruz) piloted a shuttle to lock onto the portal. They succeeded because Culber was able to access the memories of Trill scientist Jinaal for the right coordinates . Hugh achieving the ineffable though Jinaal paid off his growing spiritual enlightenment throughout Star Trek: Discovery season 5.

Meanwhile, Commander Rayner and the USS Discovery defeated the Breen dreadnought with one final, awesome tribute to Star Trek: The Next Generation and the USS Enterprise-D. Rayner ordered a saucer separation and gambled on Discovery's spore drive being able to jump the dreadnought if it was in the middle of both components of Discovery. Saru then led Tahal's ship to the other Breen dreadnought as Rayner's daring plan worked: All of the Breen were instantaneously sent to the Galactic Barrier, a node to the USS Discovery's journey to make First Contact with Species 10-C at the end of S tar Trek: Discovery season 4 .

Star Trek: Discovery season 5's story is a sequel to the Star Trek: The Next Generation season 6 episode, "The Chase".

Doctor Kovich's True Identity Is Daniels From Star Trek: Enterprise

It's been a long road getting from there to here..

Star Trek: Discovery finally revealed the identity of Doctor Kovich (David Cronenberg): the bespectacled Federation official, Kovich, is the older version of Agent Daniels (Matt Winston) from Star Trek: Enterprise ! In the 22nd century, Daniels posed as a member of the NX-01 Enterprise's crew and revealed Star Trek 's Temporal War to Captain Jonathan Archer (Scott Bakula). Using the codename "Doctor Kovich", which is itself a Red Directive, Daniels is now protecting the Federation and the timeline post-Temporal Wars.

Star Trek legacy Easter eggs shown in Doctor Kovich's office include Lt. Commander Geordi La Forge's (LeVar Burton) VISOR, Captain Benjamin Sisko's (Avery Brooks) baseball, and a Chateau Picard wine bottle.

Doctor Kovich introduced himself to Captain Burnham as "Agent Daniels, USS Enterprise... and other places" , which is a nod to the 26th century's USS Enterprise-J Daniels served on, but also the NX-01 Enterprise led by Captain Archer. Further, Kovich had plans for Moll, believing the skilled former courier could be "useful" after she serves her Federation prison sentence. There were numerous theories about Doctor Kovich's true identity, including that he could be a Lanthanite or El-Aurian, but Kovich really being Agent Daniels is a stunning revelation that pleasingly ties Star Trek: Discovery back to Star Trek: Enterprise .

How Star Trek: Discovery Ends For USS Discovery’s Crew

Discovery's crew gets one final reunion.

Star Trek: Discovery season 5's ending gave certain members of the crew conclusions to their arcs . Dr. Hugh Culber had one of his big questions answered about his growing spiritual enlightenment. Lt. Sylvia Tilly (Mary Wiseman) saw the growth of Captain Burnham and Commander Rayner's relationship and decided to apply a similar mentorship program to Starfleet Academy. Commander Paul Stamets (Anthony Rapp) protested Burnham banishing the Progenitors' technology, but resigned himself to his achievements and being proud of what a fine (and wise) Starfleet Officer Ensign Adira Tal (Blu del Barrio) has become.

As seen in Star Trek: Discovery' s finale epilogue, the crew of the USS Discovery assembled on the bridge in a powerful and resonant ending reminiscent of Titanic . Not only was the cast of Star Trek: Discovery season 5 all there, but so were Commanders Kayla Detmer (Emily Coutts) and Joann Owosekun (Oyin Oladejo), and Lt. Commander Ronald Bryce (Ronnie Rowe, Jr.), who missed most or all of Star Trek: Discovery season 5. It was a beautiful moment honoring the actors and characters who have spanned Star Trek: Discovery 's five seasons.

Book & Burnham Reunite At Admiral Saru & President T'Rina's Wedding

Discovery's first couple are back on..

Star Trek: Discovery season 5's original ending was the wedding of Saru and President T'Rina (Tara Rosling), which took place "several weeks" after Captain Burnham found the Progenitors' technology. The Kelpien and Vulcan tied the knot, and Admiral Charles Vance revealed that Saru has been promoted to Admiral. Meanwhile, Burnham and Cleveland Booker put their personal turmoil behind them and declared that they love each other. United once more, Book joined Burnham on the USS Discovery's next mission after Doctor Kovich summoned her with her Infinity Room symbol .

Thanks to his heroic efforts in helping locate the Progenitors' technology, Book's Federation sentence has been commuted and he is a free man.

Saru and T'Rina's wedding was attended by the crew of the USS Discovery, who are Saru's family, and many Vulcan and Federation dignitaries. While it wasn't made clear, Star Trek: Discovery 's finale hints that Commander Rayner remained aboard the USS Discovery as First Officer and Lt. Tilly returned to her teaching post at Starfleet Academy. Presumably, the rest of the USS Discovery's crew reported to their starship for their new mission after Saru and T'Rina were wed .

Admiral Saru likely took a new role overseeing Starfleet with Admiral Vance at Federation HQ so he could remain close to his bride, T'Rina.

Star Trek: Discovery Epilogue: Admiral Burnham and Book’s Son Is The New Captain Burnham

Starfleet's burnham legacy continues..

Star Trek: Discovery 's finale epilogue flashes forward roughly 30 years , placing it in the 3220s. Cleveland Booker has been happily married to Admiral Michael Burnham for decades, and they have made their home on Sanctuary Four, where Book and Michael once dropped off Molly the trance worm in Star Trek: Discovery season 3. Book also planted the world root from Kwejian he was given by the Eternal Gallery and Archive in Star Trek: Discovery season 5 on Sanctuary Four, which remade the planet's flora into a new, thriving version of Kwejian, Book's doomed homeworld.

Michael and Book also have an adult son who is the new Captain Burnham. Named for Book's nephew Leto (Luca Doulgeris), who died along with Kwejian at the start of Star Trek: Discovery season 4, Michael and Book's son is the newly promoted Captain Leto Burnham (Sawandi Wilson), who came to Sanctuary Four to escort his mother to Federation HQ and the USS Discovery's final mission. Admiral Burnham had wise words of connection and family for her son, who hopes to find the same relationships with the crew of his unnamed starship as Michael did with the USS Discovery's crew.

Admiral Michael Burnham learned the lesson that the deeper meaning she was searching for was spending the time you have with the people you love.

Star Trek: Discovery’s Epilogue Finally Confirms Short Treks' “Calypso” Is Canon

Discovery answers its biggest short trek mystery.

Star Trek: Discovery' s finale epilogue ends with one last incredible surprise as the series sets up the Star Trek: Short Treks episode, "Calypso" and officially makes it canon . In "Calypso", Zora (Annabelle Wallis) and the USS Discovery are alone in a region of space for hundreds of years when a soldier named Craft (Aldis Hodge) comes aboard and forms a bittersweet relationship with the lonely A.I. Admiral Burnham tells Zora that Discovery's final voyage is a Red Directive mission , and she only knows the word "Craft" but not who or what it means.

To synch back up with Star Trek: Short Treks ' "Calypso", the USS Discovery is retrofitted back to its 23rd-century Crossfield Class design, with the A removed from its USS Discovery-A designation . Admiral Burnham tells Zora that when they reach their destination, she and the crew will leave. But after Zora meets Craft, the USS Discovery will come back and form a new family with the descendants of her original crew. The final shot of Star Trek: Discovery is the USS Discovery given full honors by Starfleet in a sendoff as it spore jumps to its destiny in "Calypso".

Star Trek: Discovery season 5, episode 4, "Face the Strange" also set up "Calypso" but in an alternate timeline where the Breen destroyed the Federation with the Progenitors' technology.

Star Trek: Discovery Doesn’t Close The Door On Season 6 Or A Movie

There could still be more discovery someday..

Star Trek: Discovery 's ending and epilogue conclude Captain Michael Burnham's story , but despite showing the future of Admiral Burnham and the USS Discovery, the finale's coda still doesn't preclude season 6 or a Star Trek: Discovery streaming movie . After all, Captain Burnham and Discovery launch a new mission in season 5's ending before the flash forward. While Admiral Saru has a new role in Starfleet and Lt. Sylvia Tilly is back at Starfleet Academy, the rest of the USS Discovery's crew presumably flew back into action. And Discovery has many more years of adventures to come that audiences won't see.

Fingers are crossed that Captain Michael Burnham and the USS Discovery will return someday.

For now, Star Trek: Discovery is over and there are no known plans for Star Trek: Discovery season 6 or a reunion movie , but this doesn't mean it couldn't happen in the future after some time has passed. Star Trek on Paramount+ still has Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seasons 3 and 4, Star Trek: Starfleet Academy , and Star Trek: Section 31 coming in the next two years. But given that all three of those projects spun off from Star Trek: Discovery , Michael Burnham's show remains crucial to the Star Trek on Paramount+ franchise. Fingers are crossed that Captain Michael Burnham and the USS Discovery will return someday.

All 5 seasons of Star Trek: Discovery are streaming on Paramount+

Home Page › Our tours

• Our Service
• Our Photo Album

We take part in BBC series of documentaries "World's Busiest Cities"(Moscow)

Buy Tickets to the Bolshoi Theatre

Other special offers...

Interpreting and assistance at exhibitions and conferences, our garage ( vehicles+drivers), where to stay in moscow, what and where to eat in moscow, visa support, learning and discovery, our partners (trips to st.petersburg).

Copyright 2015 - Moscow Navigator

These children were living in a foster home when Russian troops invaded Ukraine.

Then a group of Russian officials came and took them.

Over the next year, the authorities filed paperwork to put many of them up for adoption.

Russian officials say the children were rescued. Experts say what happened to them could amount to a war crime.

46 Children Were Taken From Ukraine. Many Are Up for Adoption in Russia.

Supported by

The New York Times traced how a web of officials and politicians aligned with President Vladimir V. Putin’s party carried out a campaign to permanently transfer Ukrainian children from Kherson.

• Share full article

By Yousur Al-Hlou and Masha Froliak

Yousur Al-Hlou and Masha Froliak have investigated atrocities committed by Russian forces in Ukraine since 2022. They traveled across southern Ukraine to report this story.

As news of Russia’s invasion spread through Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, Dr. Natalia Lukina was waiting for a taxi at her home.

It was 6 a.m., and she was eager to get to work at Kherson Children’s Home, a state-run foster home for institutionalized children with special needs, where she served as a doctor.

By the time she arrived, the rumble of artillery fired by Russian troops advancing on Kherson City, the region’s capital, was already reverberating through the hallways. The doctor and her fellow caregivers faced a wrenching dilemma: how to protect the dozens of vulnerable children.

They were all infants and toddlers, and some had serious disabilities, such as cerebral palsy. Some had living parents who retained limited custody over them, while others had been removed from troubled homes or abandoned.

“Who else would have stayed behind to look after them?” Dr. Lukina said about her decision to remain with the children. “Imagine if we all turned our backs and left?”

Olena Korniyenko, the director of the foster home and the children’s legal guardian, had prepared emergency bags for the children two weeks earlier, and she had stocked the home with boxes of food, water and diapers.

But the building was not equipped to withstand gunfire or shelling, and the police had already fled the city. When Ms. Korniyenko called the police chief to ask about using their underground bunker just 300 yards away, he warned her that the station would become a military target.

With limited options, Ms. Korniyenko searched online for a map of nearby bomb shelters and found one within walking distance.

Amid exchanges of fire, the staff carried the children and their mattresses by foot and stroller to a concrete basement, taking with them food, medicine, electric pumps and feeding tubes for the sickest children.

A local pastor got word of their plight later that day and urged the foster home staff to take the children to his church, where he could at least provide heat, electricity and food.

So the staff moved the children again, sweeping them into hiding in the basement of Holhofa Church. They stacked boxes of diapers in the windows to keep anyone from seeing in.

One nurse, Kateryna Sirodchuk, said they were afraid that Russian forces would take the children away. “We feared that they could come and take everything under their control,” she said.

And their fears soon came true: On April 25, 2022, Russian officials found the children and took them under their own authority, eventually moving them 180 miles from home — all while filming them for propaganda.

Evidence shows the transfer was part of the broader, systematic campaign by President Vladimir V. Putin and his political allies to strip the most vulnerable victims of the war of their Ukrainian identity. The New York Times reviewed Russian social media posts; obtained photos, videos, text messages and documents; and interviewed more than 110 caregivers, legal experts and Russian and Ukrainian officials to trace the lives and movement of the children as they were taken into Russian custody.

What happened to them next, legal experts say, may amount to a war crime.

Two weeks into the invasion, Russia’s commissioner for children’s rights, Maria Lvova-Belova, sat across from Mr. Putin in a televised meeting to ask for his help.

She wanted to resettle young Ukrainian children from child-care facilities caught in the crossfire of war. He promised to remove any legal “red tape” so they could be placed permanently with Russian families.

In pronouncements before the invasion, Mr. Putin had made clear that he sought the complete cultural assimilation of Ukrainian towns and cities he believed were historically Russian. And now, as the officials shook hands, a plan for the permanent transfer and deportation of their youngest residents was set in motion.

“They believe deep down that the children are Russian,” said Serhii Plokhy, a Ukraine historian at Harvard University. “You speed up their Russian-ness by kidnapping them.”

For weeks, Ukrainian officials and police officers had struggled to find a way to evacuate the children from Holhofa Church, which was by then occupied territory. They blamed Russia for refusing to open a humanitarian corridor to allow citizens to flee from the shelling.

In April, a Ukrainian commissioner made a plea on Telegram to help rescue them, publicizing their location in the process.

Hours later, armed men led by a Russian official who called himself “Navigator” showed up at the church and demanded that the children be returned to Kherson Children’s Home. Cameras from a Crimea-based propaganda outlet filmed their arrival, and the resulting story accused the Ukrainian authorities of kidnapping the children.

The pastor protested, claiming the children were safer in his basement. But the caregivers had little choice but to obey the orders and take the children back to the foster home in Kherson City, where occupation forces had a tighter grip.

Dr. Lukina later said the move made her suspect that the children would eventually be taken from Ukraine, because “if they didn’t need those children, why would they have made us leave the church?”

In the months that followed, entourages of armed men in Russian military uniforms made frequent, unannounced visits to the foster home to monitor the children and their caregivers.

“They asked, ‘Are all of the children here?’” Dr. Lukina recalled. “We understood that if the children weren’t there, we would be gone, too.”

By the spring of 2022, the occupation of Kherson had become a template for the forced assimilation of a Ukrainian city and its residents: A new occupation government was appointed in Kherson, and a Russian flag was raised outside the foster home, where politicians and armed soldiers made trips delivering aid to the children.

Dr. Lukina scoffed when she recalled some of the impractical donations, which included Russian textbooks and huge packs of soda.

“You know that children can’t drink soda, right?” she said. “They probably just wanted to show the world that they were saving Ukrainian children.”

For the next several months, Russian officials documented their efforts to help the children on their popular channels on Telegram, a messaging platform used widely in Russia.

“Navigator,” the man who had ordered the children removed from the church, visited the foster home repeatedly. He would later be identified as Igor Kastyukevich, a Russian member of Parliament from Mr. Putin’s political party, United Russia.

Anna Kuznetsova, a deputy chairwoman in the Russian Parliament and Ms. Lvova-Belova’s predecessor as children’s rights commissioner, traveled from Moscow to deliver baby products on behalf of the party . “#WeDon’tAbandonOurOwn,” she wrote on Telegram, using a pro-war hashtag to suggest that the children belonged to Russia.

In interviews with The Times, Russian officials echoed that view, saying that the children from Kherson were Russian.

In May, Mr. Putin fulfilled his promise to Ms. Lvova-Belova by issuing a presidential decree that eased citizenship requirements: In Kherson and other occupied regions, Ukrainian caregivers could now file for Russian citizenship on behalf of Ukrainian foster children and orphans.

The decree also expedited the process so that children could become Russian citizens in 90 days or less, instead of up to five years.

The next month, Ms. Korniyenko, the director of the foster home, was summoned to Kherson’s Ministry of Health, now run by the occupation authorities. A Russian-backed official asked her to remain the director, but under his supervision. She was even offered a Russian passport.

But Ms. Korniyenko refused. She’d had enough of the occupiers, who, she said, intimidated the staff by asking them about their political views in a test of their allegiance and carried guns while monitoring the children.

Dr. Lukina resigned, too. She cared deeply about the children, but she didn’t want to have any role in what Russian-backed officials might do to them.

“I didn’t want to take part in it,” she said. “And I was afraid that they would take me away as well.”

In search of a new director, the occupation authorities turned to Dr. Tetiana Zavalska, a pediatrician at the foster home who often worked night and weekend shifts. She was sympathetic to the new occupation administration and made clear her pro-Russian views.

Dr. Zavalska encouraged the occupation authorities to formally register the foster home as a business under the new Russian-backed administration, in order to confer legitimacy to their control over the Ukrainian home and its children.

It was registered that very month.

In August, the Russian state-run television network RT ran a segment celebrating Kherson’s occupation that featured the foster home, now a legal entity in their eyes. As the host, Anton Krasovsky , approached the home’s entrance, he derided the inscription on a plaque affixed to the wall.

“The writing is still in Ukrainian,” he said, before looking up. “But the flag is ours: Russian. It will always be so.”

Dr. Zavalska, the new director, led Mr. Krasovsky on a tour of the building, pausing at the dining room, where some of the children sat at tables in their diapers.

“Enjoy your meal,” he said, as the camera panned across blank faces. “Say thank you,” a caregiver told the children. Only two of them appeared to oblige.

Later in the segment, Dr. Zavalska sat for an interview and described Ukraine’s president as a “clown.”

“I am putting my hope in Russia,” she added.

Broadcasts like these, which highlighted Russia’s efforts to absorb Ukrainian children from occupied territories, were a regular feature on local news outlets in Russia.

Ms. Lvova-Belova, the children’s rights commissioner, was filmed delivering children who had been taken from facilities in the Donbas region, in eastern Ukraine, to new caregivers. She announced that they had become Russian citizens.

On Telegram, Ms. Lvova-Belova said that she herself had fostered a Ukrainian teenager, who then obtained Russian citizenship.

Some experts on the region view these actions as a publicly orchestrated campaign by the Kremlin to justify the invasion and cast Mr. Putin as a savior.

“This is Putin’s version of doing God’s work,” said Andrew S. Weiss of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “It’s utter theater laced with this pseudo-historical view that there’s no such thing as Ukraine.”

As Mr. Putin illegally annexed Kherson and three other regions, Ukrainian forces began a military campaign to retake Kherson City.

Russian officials, fearing they might lose their grip, came up with a plan for the children in the foster home. In a private online chat for medical students, health officials in Russian-occupied Crimea recruited volunteers to help move them.

Original | Translation

The Times obtained, and redacted, a private message sent to medical students in Crimea on Oct. 20, 2022.

Natalia Kibkalo, a nurse who had worked at the home for 30 years, had just put nearly a dozen children to bed, all sick with Covid, when she heard the news: The children would be removed in the morning.

Dismayed, she could not sleep. Instead, she and other caregivers spent the night sewing the children’s names into their jackets and organizing bundles of clothes for them.

The next morning, on Oct. 21, she changed diapers and fed the children, following the normal pattern of their days. But she couldn’t stand the thought of helping to send them away and took a taxi home.

“We understood that we couldn’t do anything, that we could not stop it from happening,” Ms. Kibkalo said. “I don’t know how I could have lived after seeing that.”

Around 8 a.m., ambulances and white buses marked with the letter Z, a symbol of the Russian invasion, arrived at the foster home.

The group included Mr. Kastyukevich, “Navigator,” as well as the Crimean health minister at the time — also a member of Mr. Putin’s political party — his deputy, the student volunteers and several administrators from another foster home who would eventually become the children’s new caretakers.

Igor Kastyukevich Member of the Russian Parliament

Konstantin Skorupskiy Former health minister of Crimea

Anton Lyaskovskiy Deputy health minister of Crimea

Tetiana Zavalska Newly appointed foster home director

Aleksandr Vasyukov Former director at Yolochka, a children's home

Margarita Suslova Former deputy director at Yolochka

Yevgeniya Dmitrievskaya Social worker at Yolochka

Vitaliy Utkin Facilities manager at Yolochka

Dr. Zavalska gathered the children’s personal legal documents and medical records, preparing case files for each one.

Outside the home, Mr. Kastyukevich held one child in his arms and kissed him before passing him on as, one by one, the names of the 46 children were called out. Then they were carried onto the waiting buses and ambulances in their winter coats.

The convoy left the foster home later that morning, traversing the river in a perilous journey over a makeshift pontoon. By evening, they had arrived at their final destination.

The whereabouts of the children were never formally disclosed to Ukrainian officials, they said. But Russian officials left clues on Telegram.

The children were taken to the Crimean capital, Simferopol, and divided between two children’s facilities, including Yolochka, whose staff had previously been investigated for negligence.

Mr. Kastyukevich, who arrived with fur booties and mittens for the children, wrote on Telegram that the conditions were “much better than before.”

Russian officials have argued that the removal was an act of humanitarian intervention and legal under their Constitution because they annexed Kherson and controlled its population.

“It doesn’t matter who they are and who they were,” said Svetlana Scherbakova, a child services director in Crimea. “The children now have a peaceful sky over their heads.”

But human rights experts say Russia’s national laws do not override international obligations.

While temporarily evacuating children for their safety is permissible during conflict, it must follow strict protocols . Because Russia has not formally tracked the children’s movement or given intermediaries access to the children, the evacuation is a forcible transfer under international humanitarian law, according to Stephen J. Rapp, a former U.S. ambassador at large for global criminal justice.

“What Russia views as a humanitarian mission is a blatant war crime,” he said.

When Ms. Lvova-Belova, the children’s rights commissioner, traveled from Moscow to visit the home in Crimea, she said her office would help place the children with Russian foster families, but only if their birth parents could not be identified in Ukraine.

This was not always true.

At least one set of parents said they learned their children were in Crimea only when Times journalists visited them in Kherson six months later — even though documents showed that Russian officials had their names and address.

Their children, Mykola, who had autism, and Anastasiya Volodin, who had cerebral palsy, were placed in state custody years ago after the couple was deemed unable to care for them. Ukrainian courts had yet to decide on their parental rights, but the couple never imagined that their son and daughter might be taken from Kherson.

“I won’t allow anybody to adopt them,” said their father, Roman Volodin.

In the winter of 2022, the new caregivers, along with Dr. Zavalska, the appointed legal guardian, took steps to formally integrate the children in Russian society, even though some of them had birth parents in Ukraine who still had legal rights or who were known to the Russian authorities.

First, the caregivers applied for Russian birth certificates for the children — including the Volodin siblings — and translated their names into Russian.

The caregivers also arranged for the children to get Russian social security numbers, saying it was a requirement for the children to receive medical care.

The new documents were inadvertently revealed in a Telegram post by Russian-appointed officials .

Eventually, the children received Russian citizenship, the final step necessary to make them eligible for adoption and permanent placement with Russian families.

Legal experts said that the new documents, along with the translation of their names and their new nationalities, revealed an intent by the Russian authorities to strip the children of their Ukrainian identity, in violation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child . It may also amount to a war crime.

In December 2022, Mr. Putin signed yet another decree, allowing caregivers in occupied territories to renounce the Ukrainian citizenship of children in their custody.

Emboldened Russian officials said that there were no plans to repatriate children to Ukraine and that the children would continue to receive the “full support” of the state.

“These children now have Russian documents,” Mr. Kastyukevich said in an interview. “Let’s move on.”

The first anniversary of the war brought presidential state awards from Mr. Putin to the two Crimean officials — the health minister at the time and his deputy — who helped orchestrate the transfer of the children from Kherson.

But the very next day, the chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Mr. Putin and his children’s rights commissioner, accusing them of “unlawfully” taking “at least hundreds of children” from children’s homes across Ukraine.

“There is no suggestion that this was a temporary relocation after which the children would be repatriated,” said Payam Akhavan, a former prosecutor at The Hague.

Neither Mr. Putin’s office nor Ms. Lvova-Belova’s office responded to multiple requests for comment from The Times. But in public statements, the commissioner pledged to continue her work. At a news conference last year, Mr. Putin’s office dismissed the warrants as “petty.” Months later, Mr. Putin said there would be no “obstacles” to returning the children — so long as their parents traveled to claim them.

It is unlikely that either official will face trial, but legal experts described the case against them as “bulletproof,” citing the abundance of evidence that can be traced through open-source data.

There is no consensus, though, on how many children were forcibly transferred or deported to Russia, in part because of Ukraine’s decentralized child-care system. Ukraine claims the total number is about 19,500 children, but in interviews, officials in Kyiv struggled to break down or verify their data.

It has been 19 months since the children were removed from the foster home. A compilation of their images — from Kherson to Crimea — reveals how much they’ve grown in that time, making them harder to recognize even for their Ukrainian caregivers.

That may also pose a challenge to Ukrainian investigators, who are trying to track and return the children, and who have opened criminal cases against Mr. Kastyukevich, “Navigator,” and Dr. Zavalska, the director.

Last August, legal guardianship of the children changed hands yet again, from Dr. Zavalska to the Russian-administered Ministry of Labor and Social Policy for the Kherson region.

The appointed minister, Alla Barkhatnova, said that there was a “moral, ethical and legal” obligation to find families for them in Russia.

“We have people waiting in line to adopt or become foster parents,” she added.

Weeks later, their photos began to appear on a Russian federal adoption site, amid those of tens of thousands of Russian children. Their profiles, 22 in total, listed them as children from Crimea and made no mention of their birth country, Ukraine.

At least two of the children have been placed with Russian families, according to child services in Crimea.

Seven of the children from Kherson Children’s Home have returned to Ukraine with the assistance of Ukrainian authorities and third-party Qatari mediators . They included Anastasiya and Mykola Volodin, whose mother traveled this February to Moscow to claim them.

Anastasiya later died in a Ukrainian hospital just weeks after her sixth birthday. A doctor attributed her death to an epileptic seizure. Ukrainian authorities have resumed care of Mykola while a court determines whether his parents can be his legal guardians.

For now, the rest of the children from Kherson remain in Russian custody.

HOW WE REPORTED THIS STORY

Times reporters conducted more than 110 interviews over the course of a year with the children’s relatives and caregivers from Kherson Children’s Home, Ukrainian officials and prosecutors, Russian-appointed officials in occupied Kherson and Crimea, caregivers at two Crimean children’s facilities, humanitarian volunteers in Crimea, adoption support group administrators, attorneys in Russia, international war crimes lawyers and experts, historians, and military experts.

To trace the 46 children from Kherson Children’s Home to Crimea, The Times searched Ukrainian police and government missing persons directories and found the children’s full names and photographs. (Reporters discovered errors in some of the profiles that were later corrected by Ukrainian investigators after they were contacted by The Times.) Using these profiles, as well as images obtained exclusively from the children’s caregivers, The Times confirmed the whereabouts of the children on at least 13 occasions between 2022 and 2023. Reporters discovered the children in videos and photos posted to Telegram by Russian officials who visited them, in documentaries produced by Russian propaganda outlets and in advertisements for a Russian Christmas toy drive. The reporters built a database of the children’s faces over time and corroborated their results with Ukrainian caregivers. They then used the data to sift through thousands of profiles on a Russian federal adoption website and identified at least 22 children from Kherson Children’s Home who have been put up for adoption and foster care in Russia.

To identify the Russian officials involved in planning and carrying out the removal of the children, The Times paired interviews with data obtained from public platforms, including legislation and archives published by the Office of the President of Russia and the Office of the Children’s Rights Commissioner; Crimean and Russian news clips; photos posted to Vkontakte and Odnoklassniki, two popular social networks in Russia; videos shared on public Telegram channels of Ukrainian and Russian officials; and tax documents found on the Russian registry of legal entities. Reporters cross-referenced their findings with exclusive documents, text messages and photographs provided by the children’s caregivers in Kherson and volunteers in Crimea — some of which were reviewed by analysts at the Institute for the Study of War. They also reviewed and independently verified information sourced from Telegram bots that leak Russian data, and websites that use facial recognition software.

Video and photo editing by Natalie Reneau. Translations and additional research by Oksana Nesterenko. Additional translation by Milana Mazaeva. Rebecca Lieberman contributed design from New York. Adam Coll, Slava Yatsenko, Anton Lavreniuk and Evelina Riabenko contributed field production from Kherson City.

Yousur Al-Hlou is a senior video journalist for The Times reporting on breaking news and investigative stories in conflict zones around the world. More about Yousur Al-Hlou

Masha Froliak is a journalist who has been covering the war in Ukraine since the Russian invasion in 2022. More about Masha Froliak

Our Coverage of the War in Ukraine

News and Analysis

The decision by the Biden administration to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia  with American-made weapons fulfills a long-held wish by officials in Kyiv  that they claimed was essential to level the playing field.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested that Ukraine’s use of U.S.-supplied arms could expand beyond the current limitation  to strikes in the Kharkiv area.

Top Ukrainian military officials have warned that Russia is building up troops near northeastern Ukraine , raising fears that a new offensive push could be imminent.

Zelensky Interview: In an interview with The New York Times, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine challenged the West  over its reluctance to take bolder action.

Fleeing a War Zone: A 98-year-old Ukrainian grandmother stumbled past corpses and bomb craters  to escape Russia’s attacks.

Russia’s RT Network : RT, which the U.S. State Department describes as a key player in the Kremlin’s propaganda apparatus, has been blocked in Europe since the war started. Its content is still spreading .

How We Verify Our Reporting

Our team of visual journalists analyzes satellite images, photographs , videos and radio transmissions  to independently confirm troop movements and other details.

We monitor and authenticate reports on social media, corroborating these with eyewitness accounts and interviews. Read more about our reporting efforts .

Advertisement

• Rider Notes

2003 Trek Navigator 300

A 26″ aluminum frame comfort bike with upper mid-range components and rim brakes. Compare the full range

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Navigator 300

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,529 days